whirlpool quiet partner 1 user manual
LINK 1 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF
LINK 2 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF
File Name:whirlpool quiet partner 1 user manual.pdf
Size: 2051 KB
Type: PDF, ePub, eBook
Category: Book
Uploaded: 26 May 2019, 14:43 PM
Rating: 4.6/5 from 735 votes.
Status: AVAILABLE
Last checked: 5 Minutes ago!
In order to read or download whirlpool quiet partner 1 user manual ebook, you need to create a FREE account.
eBook includes PDF, ePub and Kindle version
✔ Register a free 1 month Trial Account.
✔ Download as many books as you like (Personal use)
✔ Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied.
✔ Join Over 80000 Happy Readers
whirlpool quiet partner 1 user manualThe K2 was the top model of the three and replaced the ES II screw mount auto-exposure camera. It was the first Pentax to feature a vertically running metal focal plane shutter which provided a faster flash synch speed than was possible with the horizontally running shutters in the KM and KX. The K2 featured Av exposure automation as well as match needle manual metering like the KX. Unlike on the KX the aperture set was not visible in the viewfinder. Price History:Excellent solid and fairly full featured camera, has the DOF preview that I lament is missing from so many later Pentax cameras. As I am left eyed it doesn't have the disadvantage of the KX's winder. I did previously have a KX that was stolen and the only feature I miss from that is the Judas window that let you see the aperture in the viewfinder. I haven't owned this camera for long, but am very impressed with it. It is built so strongly it may well outlast my other K-mount film cameras. I do have a K1000, rescued from a friends knife drawer for free, but I cannot imagine why anyone would pay more more for a K1000 than a K2 (or KX, for that matter, if they are right handed) The easiest cure for the awkward ISO ring (for which I knocked off a mark) is silicone spray externally applied. It was stuck on this example when I acquired it but is now fine, as is the exposure compensation, something I rarely use. No dismantling needed for the fix. The lack of aperture indication cost it the other mark. Apart from those two items it may well have rated a 10. Edit: I should add that this is a good solid heavy item. It's much better balanced with Takumar screw mount lenses and the Tamron Adaptall 2's that I like than my beloved ME-F.The LX has a far more advanced metering system, but the metering of the K2 is very quick and responsive and I like the match needle layout of the viewfinder.https://www.coverdolls.com/userfiles/bush-9-inch-portable-dvd-player-manual.xml
- Tags:
- whirlpool quiet partner 1 user manual, whirlpool quiet partner 1 service manual, whirlpool quiet partner 1 parts manual, whirlpool quiet partner 1 user manual, whirlpool quiet partner 1 user manual pdf, whirlpool quiet partner 1 user manual download, whirlpool quiet partner 1 user manual model, whirlpool quiet partner 1 user manual online.
Since I had both I compared the quality of their viewfinders, and while the viewfinder of the LX is just a little brighter, the finder of the K2 is quite a lot sharper and has more contrast which makes it easier to focus. It is nice to have an exchangable viewfinder but in reality I never changed it on my LX so why bother. When on a cold winter day I pressed the shutter of my mint LX to take a photo, and the camera decided to fire half a second later, I decided to sell it and be happy with the K2. What is really bad design however is that you can hardly see the little red spot that indicates the setting of exposure compensation. That spot is half hidden.Also the viewfinder does not show whether compensation is activated, while the LX viewfinder does give such an indication. So, turn compensation back to 1x after having compensated, otherwise you might forget and your whole roll of film will be either over- or underexposed. Changing ISO value can be hard, but the solution if it got stuck is pretty simple. If you unscrew the bayonet from the camera, you get access to the ring that moves around when the ISO value is changed (coupled to the exposure compensation). You'll see some dirt or small remains of old lubricant, which can then be removed using a cotton stick and some white spirit for example, before lubricating it again. Just be carefull with the little flat spring positioned at the top of the ring; this should not be lost and repositioned when the cleaning is done. It feels nice, looks nice, has the build quality of the old Spotmatics, and because it's an underrated camera you can get the finest copy for about a third of the price of the LX.It was the first camera I bought, and I bought it brand new. Prior to purchasing it I had owned an Olympus Pen half-frame camera which I found under the seat of a second hand car I had bought. But the K2 was my pride and joy.http://eatlahgroup.com/attachment/bush-cbar4-100w-soundbar-manual.xml I think I bought it shortly after the birth of my second son, but quickly got into trouble for filling most film rolls with birds, butterflies and the like. It came with a 50mm F1.4, if I remember correctly. I did add a wide-angle, the 400mm 5.6, and a 40-120 (or was it a 45-120?) zoom. I found the microprism focusing system fantastic - was always getting comments about how sharp my photographs and slides were. I did use its mirror lockup feature when shooting with a Pentax 5.6 400mm lens. I loved the exposure metering inside the view finder, and watching it work as I opened up or shut down the aperture setting on whatever lens I was using. I bought a shoulder-brace to allow me to use the 400mm hand-held, for shooting birds in flight, and visited local radio-controlled model aeroplane meets to shoot the model aeroplanes in flight. I still have the shoulder brace. It wasn't until after my whole kit, in an aluminum case, was stolen, and I was forced to replace it with the new ME model, that I appreciated how solid the big-bodied K2 felt in my hands. The K2 is a wonderfully designed camera. However, the camera is close to 25 years old (right now 2019) and most of them have never had a CLA. I've bought 3-4 of these hoping for a good one, each time they arrive with stuck ISO ring. It's almost impossible to move the ISO setting and if you do, you might not be able to return it to a usable ISO setting. Another common fault (in my experience) erratic metering. I don't know if they are repairable or not. Best choose a mechanical shutter Pentax.The lovely K1000 is a reduced function - and more basic camera - then the K2. The K2 has lots of benchmark extras; automatic and manual function being the best. That makes people with limited knowledge of what cameras can do opt for the more expensive (bizarre but true) K1000 camera. Why? Who knows? In the hope they spend more and get more. To look and feel cool.http://superbia.lgbt/flotaganis/1649385586 One reason why the K1000 is better than the K2 is that the K2 is packed with many electrical parts around the shutter speed and metering systems. In old cameras, and these often go wrong. The K2 was not readily available outside of Japan, where it was primarily released. So the secondhand market makes it a rare one to see in Europe and some parts of the world. The only odd thing about the K2 is that the ASA dial around the lens that can seize up if not used regularly, or if the previous owner forced the ring without realising there is a button there for a reason. I never see that as a fault of the camera, but as the fault of the owner. Some say the exposure compensation mechanism (on the other side of the lens) can be easily shifted by mistake, but you'd need to be exceptionally butter-fingered to do that. Light metering can also play up if you don't use the K2 often, mainly because the K-Mount slider mechanism dries up and becomes rigid. So if you buy one, use it. And, hey; what do you expect with a camera this old. Otherwise, it's a superb camera that does what it is designed to do very well, as every other K series Pentax camera does; which means there are better and more enjoyable ones to use out there. That's why I would not recommend this camera; because Pentax made much better ones before it with the M42 mount, and after it with the K Bayonet mount. Solution to repair? - Re-orient batteries. Problem solved. Great cameras and a pleasure to use. Which brings me to the K2. I've seen a number of K2, KX, and KM models around but never wanted a large K-mount model, that is, until I saw a K2 at a used camera store. It had a great feel in my hands, and upon some research, found it was really the scion of the ES-II. Snapped it up the next day. The camera is a pleasure to use. For me, it brings back the pleasure of hearing a solidly made camera firing, and hearing the shutter and mirror go off. While I can use it in manual mode.http://artisanatlucratif.com/images/brookstone-usb-turntable-manual.pdf The aperture preferred mode works superbly for me. The first roll of film was primarily of still subjects, and in my experience, I can manipulate the lens aperture very quickly when a moving subject arises. Cons: Lack of an exposure lock on automatic. To be honest, I mostly used it on manual, but I can see how some would like to use aperture priority on automatic. (On manual, I set the speed, and crank the the aperture to match the needles.) It took me awhile to figure out that I had to hold down a fixed button in order to rotate the ASA ring, but the odd arrangement of ASA and exposure compensation can become used to. If you are thinking of getting one of these, then you will end up with one of the finest examples of Pentax film cameras. If you also end up with a KX, MX and LX even better. The K2 was the first bayonet Pentax and came out in 1975, but was short lived because the M series were in the works. There is a wonderful quality to these metal works of art that reflects in their primary mission of only being a camera, and not a computer that happens to have a lens on it.It saved me a wedding shooting, when batteries of digital were empty. My advice: never forget an analogue film SLR, when shooting feasts, during holidays in extreme temperature.SHUTTER!! Cons: heavy (but i like it) otherwise none This camera can always deliver consistent results. Its build quality is of the spotmatic series but in a K mount form. Heavy, can take abuse ( but please don't ) and after 35 years.I can say that that parts being around in another 20 - 30 years they will still be. Mechanically, the K2 was working perfectly in every respect except for the stiff asa (iso) adjustment ring and the foam seals needed replacing. Both of these are, I understand, the most common problems on this camera. I have large hands and it fits them very well and I love the weight of it. I took it by my repair guy and he is replacing the foam seals, lubricating the asa ring and giving it a good cleaning.https://kazenergy.kz/wp-content/plugins/formcraft/file-upload/server/content/files/1628a619f33200---Canon-irc-2100-service-manual.pdf This is one tough camera. The body I have has a big ding on the prism and another big ding on the base plate. It has received at least two big hits over its lifetime with no affect on function. Try dropping a K5 twice from 5 or 6 feet and see what happens to it. I also have a KX body and find the differences very interesting. The biggest is the sound and feel of the film advance. Nothing against the KX, but the K2 is sooooo much smoother. Maybe it has to do with the Seiko shutter. Slow shutter speeds up to 8 seconds is pretty good as well. The shop thought they were selling me a bargain K1000, and I ended up with Pentax's flagship camera. Beat this camera to death over the years, took great pictures all over Europe and India. Finally got to trust auto-exposure. Otherwise, a very good camera, one that has served me well. Metal shutter, automatic shutter speed option. The K2 was the top of the line. On the negative side the K2 does not have Aperture-reader (Judas) window and has the infamous dreaded ASA film speed dial. The ASA ring is also prone to getting stuck, which makes it more costly a camera to CLA. Even though the K2 has an Exposure Control dial, it does not have an Exposure Compensation Warning indicator like the K2DMD. At some time or another using the K2 you will find half way through a roll of film that you left the setting off the normal 1x. Camera Review I bought two K2s in 2008 and enjoy them very much. I still prefer my KX for traveling. The metal shutter in a K2 is truly amazing and its best feature as far as I?m concerned! The automatic shutter speed option is also handy if you want to shoot using a specific aperture and not have to worry about the meter needles aligning. I would rate the K2 close to a 10, the ASA ring and the missing ?Judas Window? is stopping it from getting a perfect score!This body has a true mirror lock up.chefjacklee.com/images/uploads/files/bosch-nexxt-500-plus-series-gas-dryer-manual.pdf Camera Review This is my favorite K-mount manual focus body followed a close second by the ME F (or Super) and SuperProgram (a very different beast). I have a black body paired with a M 50mm f1.4 and a chrome one paired with a M 50mm f1.7 as normal lenses supported by a plethora of other Pentax and 3rd part lenses from the era. Some people freak over the ISA dial around the lens mount. I guess seeing this arrangement for the shutter speed and ASA on the Mamiya NC 1000 and one of the early Nikon Bodies, it didn't surprise me like it does some people. It is o.k once you get the hang of it. Kind of like loading film. I'm not going to give it a 9 because of the ASA dial because the other K's don't have this shutter (except the DMD version of this one). Note: The price is the average for both bodies. Auto and manual exposure. Cons: Setting EV compensation and ISO is difficult If I want an easy-to-use, manual focus work horse camera I may still grab my K2. The only feature I miss is exposure lock (which was luckily later added on the K2 DMD) so I tend to use manual exposure mode so that I avoid fiddling with the cumbersome exposure compensation. On the plus side counts the generously sized mirror which means that there is no darkening of the top part of the viewfinder with super telephoto lenses. As the flagship of the Pentax K series of the mid to late 70s, the K2 boasted most of the features one would expect from a ?professional? camera or ?professionally oriented.Metering is center-weighted, accurate and reliable. I tend to think of the K2 as a K1000 on steroids. The K2DMD variant of this camera featured a motor drive, data backs as well as an aperture window. I can?t imagine why anyone would buy a K1000 if a K2 were available. You just get so much more. To my mind one of the best features is you get AE with all those great old K and M series lenses. The K2 is built like a tank and was built to last. I find it suits my hand far better than my diminutive Pentax MX.https://www.inkfactory.pk/wp-content/plugins/formcraft/file-upload/server/content/files/1628a61b05e3e5---Canon-irc1021i-manual-download.pdf I purchased a K2 used in 1992 and continue to use it to this day. The foam was recently replaced as it was in for a cleaning, lube and adjustment. It should be good for another 20 years. It will probably outlast me. One area many have difficulty with is setting the ASA. This is always brought up by detractors as a major flaw. Initially, setting the ASA can be a bit difficult. In some cases it may indicate the need for a CLA. Over time the lubrication in this area dries out and becomes stiff. Like any other mechanical device proper maintenance will take care of the problem. Once you figure out how it works it is actually quite simple to set. One thing the K2 has in spades is a ?quality feel.? It is a substantial well-made camera and the sound the shutter makes when tripped is sublime. The same level of quality applies to the K series lenses that were introduced with this series of cameras. Many of these lenses shared the same optical designs of the highly regarded Takumars, which they replaced. The brass and glass construction of these lenses shout quality. Pentax optics have always been highly regarded and with good reason. If both the lab and I do our jobs properly this camera and lenses deliver remarkable images. That is the true test of any camera.Have you considered joining the community. The original K1000 was basically a KM without depth of field preview and self-timer. The K1000 became very successful and was produced from 1976 to 1997. The top and bottom plates were changed from metal to plastic in the final production run. In 1997, the ZX-M replaced the K1000 as Pentax's intro-level manual offering. Price History:He had used these since high school and for various photo assignments over the years. I have gotten one working again and am very pleased with the results. The version I'm using is a made in Japan model. The other non-functioning model is a Made in Hong Kong version. To start, these are rugged, heavy cameras that if maintained, will last.https://iamluno.com/wp-content/plugins/formcraft/file-upload/server/content/files/1628a61b2747db---canon-ir8500-user-manual.pdf Much like its predecessor the Spotmatic, the K1000 has the match needle metering. In fact it feels identical in my hands. The only complaint other than no Dof preview or no split prism is the meter system on this one underexposes slightly is i need to keep this in mind. If I'm setting up a shot, I use a separate meter to get it spot-on. They also take the old M-42 lenses with a simple adapter. Though you will have to use them stopped down, the results are equally pleasing as the K mount bayonet lenses. I've already blown through several rolls of film and have no complaints. This camera is a joy to use (if you like old cameras like I do). Its simple and makes sense as it was designed to be the entry level model. One point I'm surprised about is how expensive these cameras are for what you get. There is defiantly a cult following around them. But if a Dof preview and split prism are a deal breaker, them you can pick up a KM for a very reasonable amount and have all the experience with a little more convenience and affordability. All said and done, I rated this camera the way I did because it is fun to use, feels substantial in the hand and yields hassle-free good results. I can't ask for more than that!It's gorgeous, but it is ridiculously expensive to buy. Superb solid Spotmatic SP1000-style camera that is fully mechanical - except for the metering system - just as the cameras that preceded it. It is no more sensational than those cameras, though. In Europe people are very keen to pay even more. I have no idea why this happens, but it does have a very fashionably trendy following in countries like the UK. Light metering tends to vary - or fail with time - and you can find many K1000's with a tendency to over-expose by a stop or two. Because the light meter is a needle-type, it can be difficult to see in dark conditions. They tend to be very clunky and loud cameras.cgalgeria-dubai.com/userfiles/files/bosch-nexxt-500-plus-series-dryer-manual.pdf More up-to-date versions were made in China with a tough and flexible impact-resistant ABS plastic top and bottom. It also stops awful dents in the top cover, although you can get cracks if you are a total butterfingers. Biking and motorbike helmets are made of ABS plastic and all modern cameras from the 1990's to date use it. Because they are newer, the Chinese versions can be in better condition, and with better working light meters; although that will vary depending on previous owners. Great for people with big hands, and it is heavy. If you want a smaller and lighter bayonet mount camera by Pentax - that is fully mechanical - then think about an MX. If you want a better camera overall, and you are not bothered about mechanical cameras, look at the ME Super. If you want to enjoy the beauty of M42 screw mount lenses and a much cheaper form of film photography with as good - if not better - quality of photography then read around the SP1000 or the SP500 or think about the Spotmatic camera. But if you really want the mechanical K1000, then the KX or KM are exactly the same thing with added extras. I can't recommend the K2, though. The first two were new, but the KM was basically the old Spotmatic F with its M42 lens mount replaced by the K bayonet. But fashions quickly changed to smaller lighter bodies so the original Ks were replaced within a year or two by the smaller M series. Nevertheles its popularity was (and still is) of almost cult intensity. One reason was that during its time it was invariably recommended as the camera for students starting art courses. To others, its stark solid simplicity appealed; it is the VW Beetle of the camera world. It was produced until 1997 to a design which in pedigree was a Spotmatic of the early 1960s. There is no doubt that, once the exposure and focus are set correctly, the K1000 can take pictures as good as any Pentax 35mm film camera ever made, even the mighty LX. It uses the same lenses and was made with the same precision - except for the later years when manufacture was outsourced to China with increased use of plastic. People keep recommending it for beginners on the basis that it forces you to learn about exposure, and their assumption that it is inexpensive. It was indeed inexpensive originally, but since about 2015 K1000 prices been inflated due to having a cult or nostalgic appeal. There are other manual-only cameras for much less money, and most auto cameras have a manual mode too - you could probably buy two or three of them for the price of one K1000. I mean a strength and reliability that made it suitable for teenagers.The simplicity and low price made it very suitable for absolute beginners. Compared with the slightly later MX it lacked the depth of field preview, self-timer and system accessories. As for the price, it was the only big five camera for under a ton. Six months on and I love my K1000. I love the way it feels, the way it sounds and the lovely pictures it takes when combined with old Pentax glass. I still don't think I'd pay the inflated prices I often see them going for (one camera shop near me wants ?100 for a well-used body) but find one at the right price and you'll definitely come to love it like I love mine.Utterly reliable in bad conditions. Cons: I bought mine new in 1984 and carried it for a year of student travel in India, Nepal, Burma, and Thailand. It has been as high as 17,000 ft in the Himalayas and a couple of miles underground in the mud of unmapped Eastern U.S. cave systems. It has proven to be completely reliable for 30 years of use. The K1000 is also a fantastic bargain for students who are learning photography. It is a completely manual SLR which forces the user to really learn the basics of aperture, shutter speed, etc if one wants to get the great shots.Utterly reliable. Great haptics. Great learning tool. Cons: No DOF preview, no split screen (in basic version) This was my first SLR, bought in new in 1989 or so. I still have it, and still use it. I have other Pentax film bodies--an ME, a Super Program, an SP1000--but I still prefer my K1000. It's been totally, utterly reliable. I think I've replaced the meter battery once or maybe twice since I bought it. But it keeps going and going and going. It's a great way to learn the basics of photography, with no gimmicks or unnecessary features: just a reliable light-tight box with a meter needle in the viewfinder. It allows you to learn and concentrate on the bare basics of photography: subject, composition, exposure, focus. It's good enough to disappear and stay out of your way. That's all you really need. Okay, onto the detail. This thing is built like a tank, no matter how hard bang mine or how much I drop it, this camera is a beast. It lasts and lasts and lasts. It is priced cheaply and is such a great beginners camera because there are only three settings, not an endless amount of digital menus like today or things like self timers back then. It feels lovely in hand with a solid metal build and a nice leatherette it feels like a luxury camera. Anyone and everyone needs this camera, there is a good reason for it being the longest produced SLR ever.My dad bought it in the late 70s to use while he was in college. It was used after that to take pretty much every family photo until they got a digital camera in 2004. My dad gave it to me in 2006 when I started taking photography classes. So my rating may be skewed because this camera holds a lot of sentimental value. But lets talk more about the camera. This camera is full manual, meaning you set all of the settings yourself. This is the best way to learn the relation of shutter speed, aperture, and film speed (iso). I highly suggest that if you are new to photography that you grab one of these and put a few rolls of film through it. You will learn so much and it will help you slow down and really think about the pictures you are taking. I really believe that this camera has helped me become a better photographer overall by not having auto modes and forcing me to learn how to do things the old way. The build quality of this thing is amazing, its heavy and big and feels substantial in your hands. Mine is the all metal version and I love it. It feels like you are holding something of value. Also these cameras were built to last. Mine has taken thousands of photos and hasn't had any work done on it since it was bought in the late 70's. It still has the original light seals and I even have the two lenses that were bought with it and they both work like new as well. The only thing I've changed on it is the batteries and the leather. Its a great camera and every pentaxian should own one. TLDR This is a great beginner camera for learning on, it's solid and reliable, you should buy one right now. Cons: Brand new in box. I only offer this review to point out that the perfect price is falling. I have a working MX and sold this example at a profit. Edit: It was a black leather Special Edition. It's nearly new one I am very with it and its all things very very well. You can find my photos taken with K1000 and Miranda 28mm f2.8. I used Ilford Delta 100 ASA film. It's simple, easy, and straightforward to use. I've used mine for quite some time now, it's awesome. The sound it makes is beautiful, and the overall use of the camera is easy. The only part that annoys me is that without a lens cap, the battery runs out quickly. I don't see why Pentax didn't just incorporate a switching mechanism into the camera, like a half-press on the shutter. The needle annoys me a little because it's kinda hard to tell exactly how underexposed or overexposed you are. Other than that, this camera is great. Definitely recommended for anybody looking to get into film photography.I have shot thousands of shots with this guy. Super reliable, only need a 357 batt for the meter. I just love the giant viewfinder and the simplicty of this beast!!!The all manual nature of the camera is the best part!! I learned much about the interactions of shutter, aperture and film speed. And the best part I didn't realize I was learning anything. I never missed a shot because I didn't have an all auto machine gunning rig. It became second nature to set the values then focus then shoot. Add to that amazing workmanship and quality materials make for an almost indestructable machine. Still going strong after almost 30 years in my hands!!! Yes I gave it a 10! That is what it means to me. And since it was the like the longest in production camera ever, I'm not alone. Joel P.S I'm gonna get her and take for a spin.Beyond that, even though a DoF preview would be nice, it's not really a necessity. This camera really can do anything that an up-market model can do -- it just takes a deeper understanding of how the camera works. Exposure bracketing. Do it yourself but no problem. Double exposures? Sure, but it's fiddly. High-contrast setting compensation. Sure, if you meter off an area with your subject's approximate illumination. This camera can take any picture you see in your mind if you know how to use it properly. You'll learn how to take a picture with this camera in a minute. You'll learn how to capture an image with it in a few years. And that journey, learning to capture an image, will be enjoyable, exciting, and much more informative than with an automated camera.Have you considered joining the community. Price History:I think it was abused somewhat despite it's almost otherwise prestine condition. That's ok, it works like my Minolta XD 11, which I love and will never sell. The best feature of the K2 and K2dmd in my opinion is the exposure compensation control placement which is operated via a ring around the lens mount. The only cameras that got this right were these Pentax's and the Olympus OM 2. (Maybe later OM's but I've never owned any of those) So easy to use. The only thing that I absolutely can't understand is the placement of the exposure lock function. Why?! Nikon got this right with the FE and F3 via the self timer and a simple button near the self timer respectively. Just not well thought out I guess. Anyway, I can strongly recommend this camera despite the one and only design flaw I could find. Edit: Two design flaws. The finder blind only works in auto mode, the only canera I've owned with this limitation. I've adjusted down to an 8. Not very nice of me considering what I paid for it. The camera and genuine K to M42 adapter actually worked out free once I sold off the other stuff that came with them, so that partially makes up for the ?180 I spent on the two non-functional K2s. The K2DMD is a good, solid camera that produces good results. I use mine on the automatic (Av) mode and exposures seem fine. It feels good in the hand as it's quite large and heavy, which I like in a camera (as long as I'm not using it for travel - I have other cameras for that). That same criticism can be levelled at almost all Pentax film cameras though. The KX, which is broadly similar to the K2DMD, doesn't have that limitation as the shutter is fully mechanical. The same goes for the other K series cameras. So I am always a bit worried that the electronics might fail when I'm using it. Of course any camera this old can spontaneously fail for any number of reasons while out and about but the electronics is just another thing on the list. Though the K2DMD is superior in features, the Minolta SRT cameras (which are almost identical in size and operation as the K series bodies) are a bit more pleasant to use, working more smoothly and 100 mechanical apart from the light meter. The K2 is nicer to use than the other K series bodies, if for no other reason than the nicer shutter sound (which may seem minor but I'm a fool for a great-sounding shutter).