7

environmental microbiology manual

LINK 1 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF
LINK 2 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF

File Name:environmental microbiology manual.pdf
Size: 4547 KB
Type: PDF, ePub, eBook

Category: Book
Uploaded: 13 May 2019, 23:16 PM
Rating: 4.6/5 from 724 votes.

Status: AVAILABLE

Last checked: 11 Minutes ago!

In order to read or download environmental microbiology manual ebook, you need to create a FREE account.

Download Now!

eBook includes PDF, ePub and Kindle version

✔ Register a free 1 month Trial Account.

✔ Download as many books as you like (Personal use)

✔ Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied.

✔ Join Over 80000 Happy Readers

environmental microbiology manualManual of Environmental Microbiology, Fourth Edit.The Manual of Environmental Microbiology, Fourth Edition, provides comprehensive coverage of this critical and growing field. Written in accessible, clear prose, the manual covers four broad areas: general methodologies, environmental public health microbiology, microbial ecology, and biodegradation and biotransformation. This wealth of information is divided into 18 sections each containing chapters written by acknowledged topical experts from the international community. From Marcus Terentius Varro's observations regarding unseen “minute creatures” more than two millennia ago to Antonie van Leeuwenhoek's first glimpse of the “animalcula” beneath his lens, there is no place on Earth—from thermophilic, acidic springs to the air we breathe to the deepest subsurface locations we have yet been able to reach—where people have looked and not found microorganisms of some type. The domain of what may be considered environmental microbiology thus continues to expand beyond the textbook definition of “the study of microorganisms existing in natural and artificial environments.” At the same time, our knowledge of microorganisms is increasing at an ever-more rapid rate as the result of incredible improvements in analytical methodology, especially at the molecular level. When compiling a manual of this nature, therefore, how does one determine what to include and what to exclude. In the end, the editors decided to showcase as much information as possible on some of the most important areas of environmental microbiology, to provide a clear sense of the possibilities presented by the existence of microorganisms in various environments. Further and more detailed information can be found in the wealth of expertly chosen references within each chapter. Methods and media based on the application of these substrates enable specific and rapid detection of a variety of microorganisms.http://www.ez-qc.com/uploads/file/dixie-narco-5000-manual.xml

Tags:
• environmental microbiology laboratory manual, environmental microbiology lab manual, environmental microbiology lab manual pdf, environmental microbiology manual, manual of environmental microbiology, manual of environmental microbiology 3ed pdf.

Examples of target pathogens include Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp.Numerous studies have sought to develop culturing techniques for anaerobes to enable the elucidation of their basic physiology, pathogenic mechanisms, and ecological functions. This chapter will describe a brief history of the development of anaerobic culturing techniques from the historical Hungate technique to techniques and apparatuses commonly used in modern laboratories.This is a significant impediment for both academic and applied microbiology, necessitating innovations in cultivation technologies. Several recently advanced methodologies offer a promise to close the gap between the high richness of environmental species and low number of their cultivable representatives. This chapter will describe the state of the art in microbial cultivation methods, their principles and application. These methods are categorized into two types: “in situ cultivation” whereby microbes are cultivated in situ, and “high throughput cultivation”, mostly in vitro. In the first group, the following methods are described in detail, 1) Diffusion chamber, 2) i-chip, 3) Microbial trap, and 4) Hollow Fiber Membrane Chamber. In the second group, we focus on Gel miro-droplets (GMDs) based cultivation and micro-fabrication based technologies. The chapter will also discuss their relative merits and respective biases. These methods are based on electromagnetic radiation and result in either elemental characterization or structure visualization. Both aspects are relevant for the investigation of microbe-habitat interactions why a correlative detection of microbial cells would be useful. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is an ideal technique to identify and localize microorganisms but requires a cell-detection via fluorescence microscopy which has a limited optical and elemental resolution.http://dissanna.com/temp/fckeditor/dixie-narco-501e-parts-manual.xml Therefore the utilization of nanogold as marker for in situ hybridization approaches is of great potential. Gold labels can be visualized with one of the aforementioned techniques on resolutions beyond light microscopy and allow the identification and localization of single microbial cells in their habitat in situ. The basic principal and potential of this method is described in this chapter giving an overview on the development steps of gold-targeted cell detection as well. Selected results exemplarily show applications in environmental microbiology both via fluorescence microscopy and electron microscopy including elemental mapping. Techniques that measure activity at the single cell level and simultaneously allow for taxonomic identification, despite being labor intensive, provide a window into a world once known only as the microbial black box. In this chapter, three of such approaches that combine microautoradiography with FISH are explored, with a focus on Substrate-Tracking Auto-Radiography Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (STARFISH). The technical aspects of the protocols were summarized for a better understanding of the applications, their strengths and limitations. These techniques can quantitatively interrogate whether organisms of interest can metabolize particular substrates without the need of cultivation. Examples of various applications are presented. Advancement in high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies has quickly generated large amount of microbial genomic information. Techniques like STARFISH can be applied to validate in silico genetic predictions of microbial metabolic function. In general, immunoassays provide rapid assay times relative to other conventional methods such as colony counting and PCR approaches. The development of recombinant antibody technologies to produce antibodies with enhanced binding affinities will lead to immunoassays with better sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility.http://www.raumboerse-luzern.ch/mieten/canon-sx200is-manual-pdf The development of alternative affinity reagents, such as aptamers, engineered proteins and peptides, will provide a greater repertoire of affinity reagents to develop novel immunoassays. Recently, multiplexed assays for the detection of foodborne and waterborne pathogens and toxins have been developed using planar and bead-based microarray approaches. Because environmental pathogens are mostly present in very low numbers, a highly sensitive detection method is necessary. In addition, real-time detection is requisite. Biosensors have the potential to address both of these requirements. Indeed, biosensors are the fastest growing technology for pathogen detection. Integration of biosensors into environmental and food safety monitoring systems is likely to increase in the coming years potentially leading to the development of novel methods that are capable of providing the necessary sensitivity and assay speed to replace the current standards. This chapter defines PCR, reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR), real-time PCR, digital PCR and isothermal amplification. Within each subject a brief overview of the process is given along with the required reagents or components and highlighted applications. RT-PCR allows detection and characterization of RNA with options for one-step and two-step RT-PCR procedures with different advantages and disadvantages. Real-time PCR is typically coupled with a fluorescent-based reporter system such as an intercalating dye or a sequence specific probe. Real-time PCR can be used for direct measurement of DNA targets or it can be coupled with RT-PCR to quantify RNA targets. Digital PCR has only recently become widely available and provides a means to quantify targets in a sample based on direct estimation rather than by making estimates from standard curves. Many isothermal amplification methods have been developed to amplify nucleic acid targets without the need for thermalcycler technologies.http://oeztuerk-velbert.com/images/compaq-nw8240-manual.pdf In this chapter, I propose a definition for an environmental diagnostic (EVD) that is consistent with the FDA's definition and meaning of an in vitro diagnostic (IVD), where the emphasis is on the use of the diagnostic to make a decision and take action relative to the effect of a particular condition on human health. In this context, the underlying microarray technologies, methods of manufacture, and intended use can significantly impact the quality and reliability of an environmental diagnosis. Current and future technology should therefore focus on reducing the variability of environmental microarrays during manufacture and use, so that repeatable results can be obtained independent of the user. Analytical process simplification, perhaps through amplification microarrays described in this chapter, may help achieve the objective of repeatability for independent users, but technology per se will not substitute for a clearly defined intended use, effective product design, and objective verification and validation data. At present, the absence of regulatory oversight for EVDs is both a blessing and a curse. It is therefore expected that future technical solutions for realizing microarray-based EVDs will only come with a consensus biological and regulatory opinion regarding the meaning of environmental nucleic acid signatures relative to the real or perceived risks associated with each intended use. This information is presented both to highlight the state of the field, and to also highlight major questions that students may wish to consider investigating further. Where possible we will cite studies that have been conducted and published either in traditional peer-reviewed or other literature (e.g., AOAC International Methods). Experts on various aspects of next-generation sequencing have contributed to this section, including chapters addressing the analysis of microbial communities through the study of (a) ribosomal RNA gene amplicons (Ionescu); (b) shotgun metagenomic sequence data (Lal and Sangwan); and (c) shotgun metatranscriptomic sequence data (Sarode et al.). In addition, this section includes a chapter reviewing functional metagenomics (Marchesi and Morris) and sequencing platforms for environmental microbiologists (Green). In this chapter we specifically address the use of PCR amplification coupled with high-throughput sequencing for the analysis of microbial community composition and structure, and for subsequent visualization and statistical analyses of this community data. However, while this approach predominates in the literature, it does not provide an insight into the novel functions within a system and does not provide physical DNA for manipulation. In order to obtain novel functions from a microbial community, functional metagenomics was developed. This approach, which preceded the advent of large-scale sequence based metagenomics coupled with next generation sequencing, revolves around hosting and expressing heterologous DNA in a suitable surrogate host. Coupled with phenotypic screens functional metagenomics provides an alternative approach to obtaining functionally active genes from a microbial system, without the need to culture any organisms. These nutrient data have come from nucleic acid based cultivation-independent surveys (CIS) of microbial communities sampled during the past two decades. Often, these communities have been surveyed using PCR-based sequencing approaches targeting organisms at the domain level. In this review, the existing concepts, methodologies and approaches for metagenomic data analysis are outlined in order to highlight the potential of community genomics (metagenomics) to decipher the metabolic potential of microbial assemblages.Molecular and analytical tools for analyzing metatranscriptomes using high-throughput sequencing have advanced rapidly in recent years and continue to evolve and expand. The technique is increasingly available to individual research projects, even those with a modest budget or lacking an extensive bioinformatics toolkit. A core set of metatranscriptomic practices can now be identified, with key steps including RNA extraction, messenger RNA (mRNA) enrichment, synthesis of complementary DNA (cDNA), shotgun sequencing of cDNA, and bioinformatic analysis of sequence data. This chapter explores key questions that researchers should consider before beginning a metatranscriptomic study and then describes in detail the major steps of a sequencing-based metatranscriptomic analysis, from RNA isolation to functional and taxonomic analysis of sequence data. The questions and methods described here provide an introductory framework for environmental microbiologists interested in using metatranscriptome sequencing to explore microbial community gene expression. In order to assure that these requirements are met, a QA program needs to be in place.A goal of the QA program is to give management the opportunity to provide input and take responsibility in the planning, implementation, and assessment stages of the environmental microbiology project. The QA Plan should have sections devoted to laboratory facilities, personnel, and equipment; sampling procedures and handling; and deviations, record keeping and audits. A QA program outlines the components of a laboratory testing scheme that should be monitored whether it be daily, weekly, monthly and yearly, while the QC checks are put into place to ensure the discrete testing method components used throughout the testing protocol contribute minimal amount of error to the results. This outlined section is designed to give an overview of general laboratory QC practices for microscopic detection of microbial organisms. However these data are not always the appropriate data to answer the questions the researchers are interested in. In this chapter we discuss what needs to be done to ensure that what you think you are discovering is in fact what the data are saying. We encourage a large amount of statistical thinking prior to the first data point being collected or before the first sample is obtained. Statistical thinking is not generally taught in introductory statistics classes. The nuts and bolts of what will be discussed in the chapter do find their way into statistic classes however not necessarily in a way that prepares scientists for the task of doing science. Here we discuss concepts such as defining the problem, experimental design, the weight of evidence, statistical power, and sources of variation, scope of inference, measurement scale, scale transformation and other topics. We show that environmental microbiology done without careful thinking before, during and after data collection rarely can answer any important question - regardless of how big the spreadsheet is. After reviewing countless papers for over three decades it is our experience that many studies in environmental microbiology are statistically weak and more importantly statistically flawed and that one need read no farther than the methods to decide whether to continue to forward. The framework for the discussion draws relationships between investigation goals, conditions and the selection of sampling techniques. Considerations include identifying target microbes, downstream analytical methods, anticipated water quality, acceptable method detection limits, and application of discrete versus composite sampling. Small-volume and large-volume sampling techniques are discussed for application to a wide range of water types, including drinking water, ground water, surface water, recreational water, and marine water. The chapter describes and compares alternative techniques for sample collection and processing for viruses, bacteria, and parasites, as well as identifying techniques that to capture of multiple microbe types. Field sampling techniques are discussed, as well as laboratory-based sample processing techniques to concentrate water samples for analysis. Issues related to sample quality are addressed as they relate to processing inefficiencies and potential for inhibition of analytical procedures. Microbial surface sampling appears to be a simple task, but success depends upon knowledge of the molecular target or organism(s), choosing the right sampling strategy, selecting best tool (contact plates, swabs, sponges, wipes, etc.), the optimal storage conditions, and the best elution technique for recovery of the target or organism from a sampling device when one is used. Both current and historical approaches to surface sampling, as well as industry standards and the latest research on microbial surface sampling are discussed. Soil is a dynamic environment, ripe with changing viral, prokaryotic, and eukaryotic populations, all awaiting assay. Soil sampling, depending on the assay, experiment, or project can vary from simple probes, deep cores, to soil slurry collections. Atop of this, soils must be collected from a statistically sound perspective as well as considerations made for physiological, cultivation, or molecular analysis. This chapter will focus on the use of soil sampling equipment, schemes, assays, and case studies aimed at introducing the reader to the various caveats and potential pitfalls associated with soil sampling. No one chapter can attempt to cover all potential characteristics of a specific soil sampling situation; therefore, this chapter will focus on general trends in microbial soil sampling. This chapter discusses the wastewater treatment process and provides a description of how sampling should be performed at the different stages. General sampling procedures and considerations are described, including the use of controls and appropriate sample handling conditions. The chapter provides an overview of the required regulatory sampling as well as provides insight on other rationales for sampling of wastewater and biosolids. Sampling for regulatory microorganisms, including indicator organisms (fecal coliforms) and pathogens (Salmonella spp., enteric viruses, and helminth ova) can inform us about the safety of wastewater discharged or biosolids used in land applications. Discussion of standardized methods for the sampling of bacteria, viruses, and eukaryotic microbes are summarized here. This chapter does not focus on the methods used for isolation and detection of microbiological targets, rather concentration and purification techniques are described for a variety of organisms, including bacteria, viruses, protozoan and helminths. The microbiological quality of freshwaters and drinking waters is usually monitored by the detection of traditional indicators that include total and thermotolerant coliforms, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus spp. Culture methods are usually employed to detect bacterial indicators, but emerging techniques that include the detection of bacteriophages, as well as PCR-based methods amplifying bacterial 16S or 23S rRNA genes also have been developed. Molecular methods targeting indicator bacteria may reduce the time needed to take action to reduce the impact that fecal contamination of freshwaters and drinking waters represent to public health. In freshwaters used for recreation and consumption, identifying the source of the fecal contamination is important in order to reduce or eliminate its impact to pubic health. Microbial Source Tracking (MST) methods have been developed to identify the possible source (e.g. animal vs human) of the fecal contamination and include amplification of nucleic acids of traditional indicator bacteria. While bacterial indicators have successfully been used to protect public health for the last 100 years, and variations on the theme will be in use for decades to come, the target microorganisms would probably need to be revisited, because of the little information we have about their ecology. These organisms produce a variety of bioactive secondary metabolites that are of public health concern. Because there is no broadly accepted protocol for monitoring and managing these organisms, the focus of this chapter is to outline all necessary information to develop a CyanoHAB monitoring strategy. To begin the environmental microbiology exercises, the laboratory experience of the fourth week of the semester, usually in late March to early April, involved the students going on a boat trip in Jamaica Bay. The ship’s captain and crew and the class instructor provided thorough safety instructions and shipboard procedures. The students were given instruction about marine safety procedures prior to boarding the vessel, and all personnel on the vessel were required to wear life jackets from boarding of the vessel until the vessel returned to shore. While on this trip, an introduction to the ecology of this region, which includes the largest national urban park, The Gateway National Recreational Area, was given. The prime objective of this lab was for each pair of students to become familiar with the basic collection equipment and to collect a water and sediment sample at depths of 15 to 25 feet. With the assistance of their instructor, students learned how to use sampling equipment: a LaMotte water sampler, a benthic box, and a VanVeen sampler. Beyond these collections, some students enthusiastically volunteered to collect samples from their backyards, vacant land in their neighborhoods, and local ponds and beaches. The additional sites provided a wide range of samples representing different microbial communities on which the students could conduct future experiments. After collection of enough sediment to fill a 1gallon Ziploc bag, students classified their sediments as mud, clay, silt, or sand based on the color and texture. White to tan colored sediment with a gritty texture when rubbed against a ceramic tile is sand. Clay is usually chocolate brown in color with a smooth texture. Silt is usually chocolate brown in color with a gritty texture. Mud is usually black in color and is a combination of smooth and gritty textures. Upon returning to the laboratory, the students stored all their samples in a refrigerator. Actinomycete isolation and testing for antibiotic production. To isolate actinomycetes, bacteria well known for their ability to produce antibiotics, actinomycete isolation medium, chitin agar, and starch-casein agar were used ( Table 2 ). Each student pair purified colonies that appeared to be actinomycetes on glucose peptone agar plates, using previously learned pure culture techniques. In the fifth week, these purified colonies were examined macroscopically and microscopically. Based on these observations, colonies preliminarily identified as actinomycetes were then grown in two types of fermentation broth, yeast extract and glucose peptone broth, for 1 week. Actinomycetes were tested for antibiotic production against a variety of gram-positive bacteria ( Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis ), gram-negative bacteria ( Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Serratia marcescen s), yeast ( Candida albicans ), and filamentous fungi ( Aspergillus niger ) by an agar diffusion assay similar to that carried out for Kirby-Bauer testing of antibiotics. Glucose peptone agar plates were swabbed with the test organisms. Then, disks saturated with the 1-week-old actinomycete culture broths were placed on the seeded plates. After incubation, the students examined plates for zones of inhibition and measured them in millimeters. The number of actinomcyetes capable of producing antibiotics was determined. This longitudinal study took 8 weeks for the students to complete. TABLE 2 Components of media used for Actinomycete isolation and testing for antibiotic production Medium Component During the 4-week incubation period previously mentioned, the collected sediment and water were continually used to set up other experiments. Student pairs prepared a Winogradsky column using their sediment and water samples. Plastic fluorescent light containers were cut to 12 inches in length and used for their columns. A rubber stopper was placed at one end, the column was filled with sediment and overlayed with their water sample, and plastic wrap was used to seal the opposite end. Students recorded ongoing changes in color and gas production taking place in the Winogradsky column over a 6-week longitudinal period and submitted a written report, including labeled drawings of their column, for each of the 6 weeks. Culturing microalgae. Water and sediment were also used to culture microalgae. Sediment was placed in plastic petri dishes and the water sample was added. Coverslips were then placed on top of the water-sediment layer and exposed to sunlight for 1 week. Students examined their sediment each day to ensure their cultures were not drying. If drying was evidenced, more water sample was added. After 1 week, the coverslips were placed on glass slides and examined with a microscope for microalgae. Water testing for coliforms. The water samples were tested using the Colilert water testing system (Idexx Laboratories) to determine the presence of total and fecal coliforms. The Colilert testing system consists of a sterile 100-ml plastic bottle and Idexx Colilert reagent powder. The students put 100 ml of their water sample in the sterile bottle and then added the Idexx Colilert reagent. After incubation the students observed the color of the water in the bottle, with yellow indicating the presence of coliforms. If the water in the bottle was yellow, it was then exposed to long-wavelength ultraviolet light. If the water fluoresced, fecal coliforms were present. Detailed procedures for all of these exercises were provided to the students in Laboratory Exercises in Microbiology ( 11 ). The students used this manual throughout the course and were asked to perform the experiments following the procedures in the lab manual. Since minimal time was taken during the lab to state the procedures, students worked on their experiments for most of the 3-hour lab periods. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Field trips provide educational experiences for students well beyond any limitations of traditional classroom work. The importance of field trips in biology majors’ courses, such as botany and ecology, has previously been reported ( 1, 12 ). Hupper et al. ( 4 ) reported that teaching students about their environment using field trips empowered students, leading to the development of citizens concerned about environmental issues. For the past 5 years Kingsborough’s General Microbiology classes have been taken out on a research vessel to collect water and sediment samples. During this time, there have been at least two students each year who had never been aboard a boat. The students initially were surprised when they were informed they would be going on a field trip in a microbiology course and carrying out experiments actively involving them in collecting specimens with marine sampling equipment. Based on their other laboratory experiences, most students assumed that all lab materials would be prepared for them. When the reasons for the field trip were discussed, students began to realize the extent of the field of microbiology to include ecology, soil and water chemistry, and marine science. It is usually possible to rent safe, reliable vessels on an hourly basis. Many of the experiments described in this paper could also be carried out using soil samples collected from gardens, backyards, vacant land lots, fields, and farmland. Sediment and water specimens could also be obtained from local ponds, lakes, streams, rivers, and beaches. The field trip during the fourth week of the semester was an early experience in the course that required students to work in pairs and begin to undertake learning activities using a team approach. This fostered students getting better acquainted with one another, learning to work with another person in meeting the goals of the experiments, and sharing responsibilities for discussing their observations and data.