7

dcaa pricing manual

LINK 1 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF
LINK 2 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF

File Name:dcaa pricing manual.pdf
Size: 4267 KB
Type: PDF, ePub, eBook

Category: Book
Uploaded: 12 May 2019, 21:23 PM
Rating: 4.6/5 from 614 votes.

Status: AVAILABLE

Last checked: 13 Minutes ago!

In order to read or download dcaa pricing manual ebook, you need to create a FREE account.

Download Now!

eBook includes PDF, ePub and Kindle version

✔ Register a free 1 month Trial Account.

✔ Download as many books as you like (Personal use)

✔ Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied.

✔ Join Over 80000 Happy Readers

dcaa pricing manualThe DCAA sets several guidelines, policies, and procedures that make sure their contractors are using procedures that are up to code. This ensures the funding being used by the DCAA is spent efficiently and effectively for the taxpayers they represent. These codes are outlined in the DCAA Audit Manual, which is a helpful guide for any firm looking to start working with organizations that require DCAA compliance. Contractors hired by the DoD and other government agencies that require DCAA compliance must follow parameters that are set by the DCAA, which requires detailed labor and cost center tracking. Inside, it states the DCAA's auditing policies and procedures. This will be helpful when updating your accounting system to make sure it meets DCAA compliance guidelines, and it lets you know what to expect when working with the U.S. Government and DCAA auditors. The DCAA audit manual was made so that all of the DCAA's requirements are in one place to minimize the need for firms and other government contractors working with them to refer to other publications. They don't issue any other technical supplemental guidance or instructions unless authorized by the director of the DCAA. The electronic version is the most current version that firms contracted by the government should refer to. During an audit, the DCAA is concerned with identifying and evaluating all activities that either contribute to or have an impact on, proposed or incurred costs of government contracts. They regularly evaluate contractors' financial policies, procedures, and internal controls and also perform operations audits that identify ways firms can reduce or avoid some of its costs. Their involvement in the contracting process will depend on what kind of contract has been agreed on, according to the DCAA Audit Manual. Usually, the DCAA will assess firm-fixed-price type contracts while they're in the proposal stage as opposed to the incurred cost stage.http://dishanirdeshpressclub.com/userfiles/fas-manual-and-computerised-accounts.xml

Tags:
• 1.0.

However, for cost-reimbursable contracts, it would be the opposite. The required retention period for records required by the DCAA can vary depending on what type of record it is. Contractors need to make records readily available, including their books, documents, accounting procedures and practices, and other data. Software solutions, like BillQuick, helps firms stay within the guidelines needed for DCAA compliance, and makes it easy to automate your processes. Investing in software can help you ensure that your firm is DCAA compliant and continues to stay that way. Using software that complies with DCAA regulations streamlines the process of becoming DCAA compliant for your firm with little work required on your end. Click here to see some examples of DCAA audit manual requirements and how software can address it. This will effortlessly make you ready for any DCAA compliance audit and organize your data so that you're ready for any other form of audit as well. Click below to try it for yourself and see if it’s easier than reading through the entirety of the DCAA audit manual. One of the most significant differences is that as a government contractor you are subject to audit by the Defense Contracting Audit Agency (DCAA). While many companies undergo an audit to test compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for financial reporting purposes, an audit by the DCAA is a specialized audit that is usually requested by a Procuring Contract Officer (PCO) or Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO). One of the questions we commonly hear from our clients and contacts is “Will the Defense Contract Audit Agency audit my business?” and “What should we do to make sure we are prepared for an audit?” The DCAA’s mission is to ensure taxpayer dollars are spent on contracts which are fair and reasonably priced.http://farrowmemoryspeakers.com/userfiles/fas-manual-handling.xml To accomplish this mission the DCAA provides the following services: A pre-award audit could include an audit of proposal pricing, forward pricing rates or a survey of your accounting system. A post-award audit could include an audit of costs incurred under the contract, compliance with Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA), compliance with Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), financial capability or claims made against you by other contractors. Per the DCAA contract audit manual (14-102), the objective of a post-award audit is to determine if the negotiated contract price was increased by a significant amount because the contractor did not submit or disclose accurate, complete and current cost or pricing data. This type of audit is covered under Chapter 5 of the DCAA contract audit manual.Covered under Chapter 15 of the DCAA contract audit manual. There are resources available on the DCAA’s website (www.dcaa.mil) which contractors can use to minimize regulatory non-compliance as well as help prepare for an audit by the DCAA. Some of the resources available include: For example, Chapter 5 focuses on the audit of policies, procedures and internal controls relative to accounting management systems; Chapter 6 focuses on the audit of incurred costs. Audit programs will include references to the applicable audit guidance contained in the contract audit manual. A review of audit programs and related audit guidance prior to the start of an audit can help the contractor prepare and familiarize themselves with what to expect during the audit. Information can be either certified cost or pricing data or information other than cost or pricing data. This document contains a listing of the criteria the DCAA will use to evaluate whether a pricing proposal is adequate. It is important to note that while the criteria is not specifically applicable to information other than cost or pricing data, the DCAA considers the criteria to be an acceptable guideline for the auditor to reach an opinion regarding the adequacy of a proposal. Review of the criteria by the contractor prior to submission of applicable proposals will minimize the risk of proposals being returned to the contractor. In addition to provisions included in contracts, the FAR is the primary resource for contractors for administering contracts. Some of the most commonly referenced sections of the FAR include cost principles, FAR Part 31; contract negotiation, FAR Part 15; and contract clauses, FAR Part 52. Make sure you are subject to audit under a specific contract provision or an applicable provision of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Review your contracts and reach out to your external accountant or a government contracting consultant if you are unsure as to whether your contracts are subject to audit. Review the information with your internal management and accounting teams to make sure you are prepared. If necessary, ask your external auditor for advice as you review the audit programs and guidance. These professionals are familiar with audit procedures and can give you valuable insight as to what the DCAA auditor is trying to accomplish. A best practice would be to index the audit work papers in numerical order to coincide with the items requested by the auditor prior to fieldwork. If necessary, have an independent party review your documentation to ensure that your information is pulled together in a logical format which the auditor will be able to dissect. This individual should be someone who is familiar with overall operations of the business and has an understanding of government contracts and regulatory requirements. The point of contact should maintain open communication with the auditor, understand why the auditor is requesting certain data during fieldwork and seek advice if unsure of how to respond to a request or question. This practice can be helpful later if documents are lost or questions arise after the audit. Take a proactive approach and employ individuals that are familiar with the regulatory issues and work with professionals that are familiar with your business and the industry. Their primary guide in these audits is the FAR and the DCAA Contract Audit Manual (DCAM). The risk of audit is up to the government, and is usually determined by a combination of the contract type, size of award, and apparent financial risk. According to FAR requirements, they will have full access to a contractors records in order to verify that the US Taxpayer is getting value for the money they spend. As a contractor, they are there to ensure that you are managing your contract correctly with respect to costs. The DCAA is the compliance checker for all things related to your contract. So, they are not just concerned with the bottom line, but they are also concerned with whether or not you are following general course of law as you work with the government. They are also very interested in your accounting practices, purchasing system, inventory management system, how you care for your product, and how you treat your employees.That means the contractor must have the necessary resources to purchase any needed inventory or equipment, and it must be financially stable. When it comes to cost type contracts, this audit is especially important because the government must ensure it is only billed for allowable costs. However, you must maintain a compliant accounting system regardless of the type of contract you are seeking. If the DCAA accepts your bid, it will also monitor your continued compliance with government accounting standards. A contractor must separate the costs of their government contracts from commercial contracts. Further, if a contractor has multiple government contracts, they must allocate costs to each contract, and the indirect and direct costs, and allowable and unallowable costs must be properly segregated. The DCAA Manual (DCAM) provides the general framework for a contractor’s accounting system. There are three types of costs that can potentially be allocated to a government contract: Be sure to perform a contract review after each contract is awarded, and contact ReliAscent if you have any questions regarding specific FAR clauses and other requirements, and how that affects your accounting system, and how you manage your contract and rates. If a contract calls for progress updates or identification of costs by line item, these must be appropriately reported. It also verifies your cost reports against your general ledger to determine whether the costs were actually incurred. Rather, the DCAA makes a determination of your system's compliance on a contractor by contractor basis. The DCAA is charged to ensure that you are managing your contract correctly, so having a DCAA compliant accounting firm like ReliAscent handle this task for you, can allow you to focus on your direct work, and be comfortable with the knowledge that your system is compliant, and you have the backing of not just an accounting firm, but a fully outsourced government contract compliance firm. Be sure to download your copy, and also request one of our free QuickBooks DCAA Compliance Reviews today, to ensure DCAA compliance. Further, in today’s contracting environment having an adequate accounting system can be a pre-requisite for contracts. Today many Requests For Proposals (RFP) require it. For instance negotiated fixed price contracts do not normally require an adequate accounting system (except when progress payments are requested), only that the cost or pricing data submitted meets the cost or pricing data requirements. These requirements are defined by FAR 15.4. The accounting system should report certain financial data to support the cost or pricing data requirements under fixed price contracts such as indirect cost rate data. An adequate accounting system subject to DCAA preferences is most relevant to cost reimbursable contracts. Under cost reimbursable contracts the accounting system must be adequate and approved by the government under FAR Subpart 16.3. Securing approval is a significant accomplishment in this industry. In some cases the government requires adequate accounting systems under time and material contracts as well. DFARS 252.242-7006 now requires it for DoD contracts. Now, DCAA will not conduct this audit simply because the contractor wants an approved system. DCAA conducts audits on behalf of procurement agencies at their request. Contracting officers request DCAA perform these audits when there is a government need. So the first thing to do is get government sponsorship. This government agency can request the audit. This request is normally associated with an open RFP or contract. These are must haves, no exceptions, to secure approval for cost reimbursable contracts. Below not only have I listed the 12 key elements, but I have also elaborated on what these 12 items mean to prepare the contractor for its approved DCAA cost accounting system. In order for an accounting system to be approved, it must demonstrate the ability to meet these 12 key elements. Each of these elements are described below. First, the accounting system must pool the direct costs and indirect costs separately by account. Second, it should maintain a policy that describes the criteria for charging costs direct to contracts and indirect to indirect cost pool accounts. Third, it must demonstrate that the personnel responsible for coding costs fully understand the criteria for costing transactions direct and indirect. Finally, the contractor’s cost history must show that it adequately and consistently charges costs direct and indirect. The contractor must demonstrate costs are accumulated by cost element and by project. This is typically accomplished by setting up a job number system and charging transactions to jobs by cost element account. The summary of all these jobs should equal the direct costs of each direct cost account in the company general ledger. Typically a summary report must be generated by job or project demonstrating the above. Often DCAA will request a job cost subsidiary ledger that agrees with the general ledger. A job cost subsidiary ledger lists each transaction charged to a job or project. The summary of all project subsidiary ledgers must add up to the direct cost balances in the general ledger. This means the indirect costs must be accumulated into separate indirect cost pools combining functions that are not disparate. This means the functions must be similar and have a similar relationship to the cost objectives being managed. A violation would be combining manufacturing functions with engineering or services functions. These are disparate functions and are not homogenous.This means the allocation base selected must allocate indirect costs in an equitable manner avoiding skewing the allocation to one or a group of contracts. Allocation bases should be selected that best represent the activity being managed. This is normally an input base, an output base or some surrogate of both. The most commonly accepted allocation bases are: Any base that would be considered equitable are acceptable. Under cost reimbursable contracts, indirect cost rates should be calculated periodically on a year to date basis and compared to the budget or provisional indirect cost billing rates. In addition, DCAA commonly will inspect and evaluate the indirect cost pools and composition to determine compliance with this requirement. Allocation bases are also evaluated to determine whether the allocation bases are equitable. That is the job cost subsidiary ledger is controlled by the general ledger. As transactions are added or deleted or changed in the job cost subsidiary ledger, the general ledger for these direct cost accounts is updated automatically. A common DCAA test is to compare the summary of job costs by job or project to the direct cost account balances in the general ledger. Failure to demonstrate this test is a formula for failure for sure. Key Element No.5: Demonstrate compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This means that direct costs and indirect costs must be accounted for on an accrual basis. Cash basis accounting systems are not acceptable. Accrual means that costs are recorded in the proper period as incurred not necessarily when paid. Costs should be accrued or recorded when the contractor is liable for the cost and in some cases the cost should be allocated over periods that the cost represents. Often DCAA will inspect and evaluate accrual entries and test their validity. The most significant accrual item is labor to match payroll with the timing of timesheets or the timekeeping system. Other common accrual items include, payroll taxes, insurance, rent, depreciation and accrual of material and subcontract transactions. Recently DCAA has also requested in certain cases evidence that revenue is accrued when required by generally accepted accounting principles. This is normally accomplished by setting up a pre-contract job or project number to separate pre-contract costs from costs incurred after the award of the contract. Pre-contract costs are incurred prior to the effective date of a contract to meet contract schedule or other significant contract requirements. If the costs incurred as pre-contract costs before the award or effective date of the contract would be allowable if incurred after the award of the contract, the pre-contract costs are generally speaking considered allowable subject to the need to meet contract schedule. Pre-contract costs are generally subject to an advanced agreement, FAR 31.205-32. Given that labor is a large component of contract cost and the government focus on timekeeping, it is a must have to be successful. Honestly there really are not any FAR or legal authoritative regulations that define what an adequate timekeeping system requires. It is limited to having a system that accurately records time to accurately charge labor to cost objectives. The timekeeping system requirements or preferences have been developed over time by regulators such as DCAA outlining preferences required. First, the contractor must maintain a written policy on timekeeping describing timekeeping practices. This document should be provided to all employees and periodic training should be provided. Both manual and electronic systems are acceptable. The government typically is indifferent as long as the system used is consistently applied in a compliant manner. In manual systems this means changes are made by the employee by single line cross out and employee initials and date. The reason for changes are often required. Essentially the ability to track changes to the time record is the concern. Under these systems, the most significant difference is all entries, changes, signature and approvals must be tracked by time stamp. In other words, it must answer the question who did what to who and when in regard to timekeeping entries. This report typically includes hours and labor dollars by employee by cost objective (projects) and indirect labor accounts. This report should tie to both the timekeeping system and the payroll system. Typically a reconciliation between the labor distribution report, the timekeeping system and the payroll are required. These costs are typically accumulated and segregated in an unallowable cost pool. Unallowable costs must be excluded from the indirect cost pools when developing indirect cost rates. Such costs cannot be included in any billing, claim or proposal. Also, it should maintain a policy defining the procedures it uses to meet this requirement. It should demonstrate that personnel responsible for coding transactions are adequately trained and knowledgable in FAR 31.2. Generally speaking contractors should make the provisions of FAR 31.2 readily available for employees as a reference document. On a separate note, indirect cost rates must be developed in a manner that allocates indirect costs to unallowable allocation base costs. If a cost is normally included in an allocation base it must be included whether allowable or not. For example any direct, fringe, or overhead cost that is determined to be unallowable per FAR 31.2 must be included in the appropriate allocation base if allowable direct, fringe and overhead costs are included in the allocation base. In addition, the accounting system must be able to present the costs on a current, year to date and cumulative basis at least monthly inclusive of indirect costs to provide a full absorption costing view of a project or contract. The balances need to be traceable to the job cost subsidiary ledger. Most project accounting systems can handle the accumulation of direct costs by project as described above. Indirect cost allocation tools may be necessary to present indirect cost allocations. The indirect cost allocation can be handled manually as well. Indirect cost allocations must be consistent with the contractors disclosed practices. This means the project must be segregated by CLIN. The accounting system must treat each CLIN as a project or cost objective and charge costs to the CLIN in the same manner as it charges costs to projects. These CLIN accumulations should be reported or rolled up to the contract level. These clauses require the contractor to track funding and contract cost. Contractors are required to notify the contracting officer when the contract costs reach 85 of funding. This will permit the contractor to evaluate the cost position as compared to funding. This cost presentation is then compared to funding. The contractor must demonstrate its capabilities to meet the applicable invoicing clause. Under cost reimbursable contracts compliance with the Allowable Cost and Payment clause is required. The major provisions include. This would include labor, materials and subcontract accruals among others. That is, invoice direct costs recorded for the period. This prohibits the invoicing of estimated costs. Invoiced direct costs must agree to the direct costs recorded by the accounting system. Should you need help with any of these items please contact me. This report examines the National Aeronautics and Space Administration'sDepartment's Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA). NASA reliesGAO assesses. NASA's (1) need for an enforcement mechanism to deter contractors fromReport to the Chairman, Committee on Government Operations, House of. Representatives. September 1994AbbreviationsLetterThe Honorable John Conyers, Jr. Chairman, Committee on Government Operations. House of Representatives. Dear Mr. Chairman. As you requested, we reviewed the National Aeronautics and Space. Administration's (NASA) management and use of audit support providedNASA awards. This report assesses NASA's (1) need for an enforcementAs the second largest civilian contracting agency in the federalDuring each of the past 2 fiscalStronger sanctions are needed to reduce NASA contractors' unallowableAlthough NASANASA procurement personnel obtained and used DCAA contract pricingHowever, over 70 percent of the contracts we reviewed did notNASA and DCAA have improved their communication and auditConsequently, limited audit resources may not have been effectivelySuch areas have beenNASA's contract audit tracking and follow-up systems were incomplete. For example, at one center, nine reports requiring follow-up were notConsequently, NASA managers did not know theFurther, NASA was largely unaware of theNASA has not taken timely action to close out contracts after workOf more than 2,600 contracts awaiting closeoutOur review of DCAA audit reports showed that NASA contractors'Unallowable costs,DCAA auditors in recent years included two cases of overstatingThese and other examples of such costs foundAlthough unallowable cost claims can be disallowed, until recently. NASA did not have the authority to assess penalties. LegislationNASA, with the authority to require their contractors to certify thatBefore this recent legislation, in situations where contractorsIn August 1992, an interagency team tasked by the Office of. Management and Budget (OMB) to review NASA contracting practices andIt is then up to theBut, as we reported in recentTherefore, the full extent of unallowable costs claimed under NASAIn addition to requiring contractors to certify under penalty ofPenalties can beNASA's Office of Inspector General, OMB's Office of Federal. Procurement Policy, and DCAA. NASA contract and pricing officials requested proposal pricingHowever, contracting officers didRegulation (FAR) and NASA FAR Supplement.\6In 25 procurement actions we reviewed, NASA contracting officersDCAA audits on contractor proposals or documented the reasons for notDCAA's recommendations when establishing the government's negotiatingThe FAR and NASA FAR Supplement require that contracting officersThe adequacy of contractor systems is important in establishingAt the centers we visited, negotiation memorandums for over 70When systems were discussed, pertinent details as to who did theFAR requirement was not applicable to their negotiations. Also,NASA headquarters' procurement management surveys had previouslyThe centers we visited have already begun to tailor their auditThe other center is developing aAccording to one center's procurement managers, although the statusHowever, someDocumenting their status in negotiation memorandums can help ensureSuch systems that could affect negotiations and subsequent contractNASA and DCAA have increased their coordination and improved theirFor example, at one center, DCAANASA's Office of Inspector General isNASA generally relied on DCAA and DOD administrative contractingContracting officers told us they periodically requested specialNASA procurement managers also did not systematically assess whetherAt the otherDCAA audits. Such functions often include working withData collected by NASA's Inspector General over the past 2 yearsDue to DCAA and NASA audit priorities and limited resources, annualAlso, few operational orAccording to DCAA headquarters'According to NASA headquarters' Inspector General officials, fieldCenter officials shouldGeneral efforts. Since NASA is ultimately responsible for managing its contracts, itMore active involvement could result in better coordination with DCAAIf these efforts indicate. DCAA's inability to provide audit coverage despite NASA's willingnessNASA did not comply with OMB and other guidance on audit reportBoth NASA headquarters and center auditNASA also did not consistently oversee and document DOD's resolutionNASA headquarters and center tracking systems did not contain allOf the 32 new audit reports referredFor example, an August 1993 report thatHeadquarters' policy was to not report these audits until the centersDOD for tracking. In response to our request in July 1994, NASA headquarters followedOne center'sHowever, central tracking of all post-awardAnother center's system tracked both reportable and nonreportableFor example, one missing report dated October 1993 questioned aboutAnother missingAccording to NASA headquarters' procurement officials, the adequacyHowever, recent surveys at the centers we visited did not assessAccording toAccording to the NASA Audit. Follow-up Handbook (NHB 9970.2), reportable audit reports include (1)This reconciliation processOMB Circular A-50, NASA's FAR Supplement, and the NASA Audit. Follow-up Handbook require contracting officers and procurementInspector General showed that NASA procurement officials did notIn a May 1994 report, NASA's Inspector General found that 53 percentDelays were attributedIn its response to the Inspector General's report, NASA's Office of. Procurement agreed to more closely monitor center contracting officerDisposition occurs whenMay 26, 1994). NASA contracting officers generally did not monitor the status of. DCAA audit reports sent to DOD for follow-up, did not always documentConsequently, NASA could not ensure that audit findings andNASA's contract auditIn certain cases, some monitoring of actions taken by DOD was beingDOD held resolution responsibility. Contracting officers in theseAlso, center Inspector General staffsAlthough NASA's policy is to optimize the use of contractInspector General staff should receive copies of audit reports onCenter Inspector.