7

boss gt3 manual mode

LINK 1 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF
LINK 2 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF

File Name:boss gt3 manual mode.pdf
Size: 2115 KB
Type: PDF, ePub, eBook

Category: Book
Uploaded: 16 May 2019, 17:14 PM
Rating: 4.6/5 from 695 votes.

Status: AVAILABLE

Last checked: 13 Minutes ago!

In order to read or download boss gt3 manual mode ebook, you need to create a FREE account.

Download Now!

eBook includes PDF, ePub and Kindle version

✔ Register a free 1 month Trial Account.

✔ Download as many books as you like (Personal use)

✔ Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied.

✔ Join Over 80000 Happy Readers

boss gt3 manual modeThe BOSS Worldwide Social Network keeps you connected to the latest products, exciting events, and much more. Registrer dit produkt og hold dig ajour med den seneste garanti. Provides an overview of key features, functions and operational tips. By using the Manual Mode various effects can be turned on or off without changing the Patch Numbers. Use the following procedure to specify Manual Mode settings: 1) Press MANUAL so it is lit to enter the Manual Mode. 2) Use the PARAMETER cursor buttons to select the desired pedal. 3) Use the VALUE dial to set the function of that pedal. 4) Press MANUAL so it is not lit to exit the Manual Mode. NOTE: The Manual Mode settings are global and are not saved in a Patch. Changing Patches will not affect the Manual Mode settings. Permission is granted to reproduce this document under the following conditions: It may be distributed, posted, printed by any means but must remain intact, with no additions or deletions either to the content or the file structure. Normally when you change banks on the GT-3, the effect will not switch until you select one of the patch pedals in that bank. The light on the pedal corresponding to the patch that was active in the previous bank will flash indicating for you to select one of the patches in the bank. The changes you made will still be present in the patch, but once you select a different patch, the edits will be removed. (O. M. p.31) Perhaps someone else has a better idea of what BOSS had in mind for using this feature.Once stored as a user setting, it can be applied to any other patch. If you always want to tune silently, you can set the tuner to Mute mode, which will cut the GT-3 output whenever the Tuner is accessed. For example, if you have the expression pedal returned in one patch, and without moving the expression pedal, you change to a patch where the expression pedal controls volume, the patch will be silent. However, the names do not describe the direction information will be flowing.http://giyimkentdestek.com/userfiles/boss-giga-delay-manual.xml

Tags:
• boss gt3 manual mode, boss gt-3 manual model, boss gt-3 manual models, boss gt-3 manual modem, boss gt-3 manual modern.

For each patch, these pedals are set to specific functions at the factory. You cannot permanently change the control functions for the preset patches. For example, if a sequencer controlled a keyboard, a drum machine, and your GT-3. The GT-3 also has a feature that allows you to tie all of the BPM values for individual effects to a MASTER BPM rate. You can even assign the MASTER BPM to a control pedal enabling dynamic synchronization of the BPM rate to match the tempo of the song you’re playing. The GT-3 will produce a feedback sound the same frequency as the note played.In the GT-3, one of the interacting notes is your guitar input, and the other is an internal oscillator.This tracking oscillator may be set to any interval in QUARTER-TONES!!! with 72 being a unison, 48 being an octave down, 24 being two octaves down, 0 being three octaves down, and 96 being one octave up. An advantage of the modeled sound is that the digital model produces the characteristics consistently every time, as opposed to real amplifiers that can sound different from day to day and year to year. The GT-3 Auto-Riff feature is capable of much more. The note that triggers the riff does not need to be the first note played in the riff. Let’s say you had two riffs that started with C. If you set up your riffs to be triggered with a C and a Db, as described above, every other note you play will cause the factory-preset riff to be triggered. This is where you set the Auto-Riff tempo in the patch to play at the correct speed, and assign other parameters as well. Even after you complete these settings, this “example” Auto-Riff will not play any riffs until you complete “Controlling the Auto-Riff”. Users who see areas of ambiguity or omission in the Owner’s Manual are encouraged to submit suggestions for elaboration in the next version of this Supplement.http://www.santha.ca/userfiles/boss-gr-20-manual.xml Usually, you should connect the Wah pedal before the distortion pedal so it can regulate the distortion however, hooking it up after the distortion may produce a sound you want. By blasting the 400 Hz range with the expression. It sets up a basic Wah, but I always felt the range was a bit limited and it lacked poke compared to the Coloursound and Vox WAH’s I have used previously. It’s still a single pedal push to switch the EP function the same way the requested CTL function would work, so it accomplishes the task simply and eloquently. But the cool thing is because you can assign 8 things to the expression pedal you can change the Treble in the preamp or maybe the high- mids in the EQ etc etc. I'm learning a solo that goes too high for me play comfortably on the neck.The following effects are often used to record. Let’s examine in detail how you can do this. In this way you can change your guitar sound without changing the synth patch. Think of it as a load of Stomp boxes. — You know, like the small Boss pedals. A common mistake made by new users is to plug the IN cable from the PC to the IN port of the GT-3 and the OUT cable from the PC to the OUT port of the GT-3. This seems to make sense, but is incorrect. The GT-3 is not a MIDI instrument. It cannot capture the notes you play and send them out the MIDI port, nor can it play a MIDI file from your PC or a MIDI keyboard. Control Pedal (CTL) - Either the fifth “push pedal” on the GT-3 counting from the left or one of the optional external push pedals that allow you to control the sounds and settings of the GT-3 with your foot. Expression Pedal - The continuously variable controller on the GT-3. (The one that looks like a vehicle’s accelerator pedal.) External - Any device that plugs into the GT-3 like a SUB CTL pedal. Manual - With regard to operating the GT-3, this is the ability to turn on and off specific effects individually while you play by pressing the push pedals without making adjustments to the patch.http://schlammatlas.de/en/node/17151 Order Of Effects - Defines where an effect is placed in the signal path. If you had individual effect pedals, this would be the sequence in which you connect them with the cables. To start viewing messages,Im thinking this might be better to get than just a few meagre pedals. I was gonna buy like 5 pedals that would cost as much as the GT-6. I demoed one tonight for about 2 hours. I thought it was really good and in manual mode could be used just as stomp boxes. Please post any thoughts you have on this unit.good or bad.Oh yeah they are built like tanks, the ex rhythm guitarist in my band had one and some fucking idiot who was helping carry gear plonked a fairly hefty 2x12 tube amp down on it (fairly hard) and guess what, no damage, being BOSS reliability will not be an issue. Yeah it's actually worth doing what I did in my demo and getting a few of your fav.Im thinking this might be better to get than just a few meagre pedals. Please post any thoughts you have on this unit.good or bad. Spent 2-3 days just reading the manual while on travel and have about 6 hours just playing with it. I like it! I had been using just a Boss OD-3, PH-2, CE-5 and a Vox Wah. Just in terms of what the GT-6 does with respect to those devices, its good enough for me. And - no more multiple boxes to connect. Just some random ramblings about the GT-6. To me - manual mode is where its at. It's tough pre-defining combinations of effects and I prefer just mixing-n-matching effects dynamically. But it is sooo easy once you get the hang of it (just remember to save your settings!!!!) I did A-B the Fender Twin modeling against my DeVille 2x12 and with a little EQ tweaking - they are very, very close. Back-in-the-day I used to use a Big Muff Pi and the GT-6 models that VERY well. I like the preamp models and can get a very smooth Santana-like tone, attack, and sustain (think Europa). The Cry-Baby wah is also very good.https://eytam.com/images/boss-gt3-manual-mode.pdf The 991 generation of the 911 had a GT3 at the start of things, then it got a GT3 RS, and then that limited-run 911 R from last year. Well, now some of those lessons have gone into making a new GT3. But okay, let’s start at the front, where there’s a new bumper, around a kilogram lighter than the one that went before it, partly because it’s a lighter material, so not only because it has more holes to let more air to the radiators, to cool the engine. I’ll come to that. But the wheels, and the brakes inside them, are the same: you can have steel rotors or optionally (and as fitted to our test car) carbon-ceramic discs. There are helper springs at the back, which allow the main springs to be lighter, and dampers are retuned all round and said to make the GT3 both ride better on the road yet be more taut on a circuit than before when you plonk them into firm mode. There’s still active rear steer. Combined with some new underbody aerodynamic tweaks, it improves downforce by 20 percent while not affecting drag at all. There is a different crankshaft, with bigger seals, it’s stiffer and it has oil channelling through it. There are new pistons, with different liners and an ever more slippery coating on them. Which sounds rather promising. Peak power comes in at 8250rpm; torque, and only 339lb ft of it, at 6000rpm. No, I don’t know, either, but there you are. The manual gearbox does without the pump and therefore gets a conventional mechanical limited-slip differential.The steering is firm and accurate and self-centres nicely. The engine’s smooth. It’s good fun to thread along.Body control is impeccably tight, yet running over kerbs doesn’t unsettle a balance that is absolutely terrific. There is poise, agility, feedback and feel to spare. All are worthy, enjoyable in their own right. A Ferrari’s quickness of steering enhances agility and masks feedback. A McLaren wants to be composed, driven somewhat in a fashion that best suits it. The GT3 isn’t like them.https://www.birdandwildlifeteam.com/wp-content/plugins/formcraft/file-upload/server/content/files/1626f02e1512f8---bosch-range-oven-manual.pdf More than I remember from last time around, when I thought the biggest advance in GT3 versus GT3 RS was that even the GT3 had a hugely planted nose. But maybe it was just this day: tyre temperatures, the circuit, my mood, who knows. Still, it’s a trait that’s easily quelled if you manage the front end as you turn or, if you prefer, get back on the power. Because of where the engine is, you can use the weight on turn-in to unsettle it. Nor should it be. And all the while, it will tell you what it is doing, and what its wheels are up to, how much grip and traction you are using or abusing, like no other car with power steering. And if somebody told me they wanted to order the best driver’s car on sale today, I’d recommend this in a heartbeat. Get all the best car news, reviews and opinion direct to your inbox. Subscribe to the Autocar newsletter now. You can unsubscribe at any time using the unsubscribe mechanism on any email you receive from us. We will use your information to ensure you receive messages that are relevant to you. To learn more about how we use the information you provide to us please see our Full Privacy Notice. Something went wrong. To provide the musicians with an option to control the desired aspects of their instrument's tone, this model is equipped with multiple controls. Product Identifiers BRAND Boss MPN GT3 eBay Product ID (ePID) 111854420 Product Key Features Model GT-3 To Fit Electric Guitar, BOSS GT-3 MULTI-EFFECTS GUITAR PROCESSOR ROLAND Additional Product Features Guitar Type Electric Guitars Product Type Pedals Instrument Family Guitar Features Chorus Body Type Solid Type Distortion Control Manual Instrument Guitar Show more Show less Ratings and reviews 5.AYTEKINPOLATEL.COM/image/files/compaq-storageworks-msl5026-library-manual.pdf0 1 product rating 5 1 users rated this 5 out of 5 stars 1 4 0 users rated this 4 out of 5 stars 0 3 0 users rated this 3 out of 5 stars 0 2 0 users rated this 2 out of 5 stars 0 1 0 users rated this 1 out of 5 stars 0 Most relevant reviews by groovetaurus149 20 Jul, 2013 To anyone contemplating purchasing a GT3 I could only highly recommend it The Roland Boss GT3 was first introduced in 1999 and has stood the test of time over the years and is still used by many professional musicians. It has a large array of tones and effects; it can be as simple or as complex as the user desires. In manual mode the user can select the amp and up to 6 effects and use it like a row of stompboxes; there are factory set tones and if needed these can be tweaked to the users satisfaction; and if one desires completely new tones can be created and saved. The GT3 holds a total of 340 user and factory tones. I found it was a must to read the owners manual thoroughly and took a little while to get the hang of going through the menus, selecting, editing, and saving so it can be a little more tedious to learn than some of the newer effect processors. The unit is built to last as the casing is made of of metal and obviously feels very solid. I bought the GT3 because of its awesome reputation and admittedly got a good deal on ebay. Despite its age it still competes well against current effect processors. Reliability and ruggedness is top notch and well suited to travelling musicians who need sturdy equipment. Read full review This item doesn't belong on this page. Cancel Thanks, we'll look into this. All Rights Reserved. User Agreement, Privacy, Cookies and AdChoice Norton Secured - powered by Verisign. This may happen as a result of the following: Javascript is disabled or blocked by an extension (ad blockers for example) Your browser does not support cookies Please make sure that Javascript and cookies are enabled on your browser and that you are not blocking them from loading.https://exactblue.com/wp-content/plugins/formcraft/file-upload/server/content/files/1626f02ef5865d---bosch-rd-532-manual.pdf It requires multiple power supplies and multiple connections between pedals. If any one of the power cords or connector cables goes bad, then the entire chain will fail and no sound will come out of your amp at all. This actually happened to me one time at a live gig as I was playing in front of hundreds of people. Just as I went to hit my “boost” pedal for a solo, which was an EQ pedal, something went wrong and no sound was coming out of my amp. It was very embarrassing because during the entire duration of where the solo was supposed to be, I was instead kicking wires around trying to “fix” the broken chain. It turns out that it was just a bad power cord, which was an easy fix. However, it was a major headache at the time. Processing pedals do an okay job of mimicking the sounds of real amplifiers, but it’s just not the real thing. Therefore, people avoid getting processor pedals and instead resort to using individual stomp boxes. I’ve also used previous Boss GT models to do the same thing (Boss GT-6, Boss GT-10, etc.), but I don’t know if other brand processors pedals can do this. In fact, all of the Boss GT processors are designed to function as a chain of individual stomp boxes if you choose to set it up that way. That’s assuming that you don’t want your pedal to function the “normal” way where each button is a completely different tone altogether. They had the GT-3, then the GT-6, then the GT-8, then the GT-10, and now they have the GT-100. They are kind of like iPhones and iPads in that they continuously upgrade their software and operating systems every couple of years. However, the Boss GT pedals don’t have the “bugs” that iPhones do because Boss takes their time with their upgrades. Boss is a company that takes pride in producing TOP QUALITY products. I purchased the GT-100 shortly after it came out, after using the GT-10 for many years, and just as I suspected, I fell in love immediately with the vast array of improvements that they made.https://controlcert.se/wp-content/plugins/formcraft/file-upload/server/content/files/1626f030052bed---bosch-range-manual.pdf Not that they GT-10 was a bad pedal or anything, but it did have room for some improvements. The GT-100 is now perfect for exactly what I look for in a multi-fx pedal! If you have another type of processor pedal such as a Digitech or Line 6, you may or may not be able to do the same thing. I would assume that those other types of pedals would work the same way, but I’ve never owned any of them so I really can’t say for sure. For this reason, I usually take 3 cables of equal length, and I tape them together. This simply keeps the cables from looking like a rat’s nest. The “preamp” within the pedal is also referred to as the “amp models”. You will be using your own amp’s sound instead. Therefore, you will not need to model other amp sounds. The newer models are much more user-friendly when it comes to setting up the 4-cable method. Every guitarist has their own pedal chain order preference, but there are pretty much universal “rules” as to what sounds best going into the front of your amp vs.This will then allow you to set one of your pedals to function as your amps’s footswitch. This is a VERY COOL feature that I just recently figured out! If you did everything correctly, than your amp should function just as it normally would, allowing you to switch between your clean and OD channels. Only now you have a nice little set of stomp boxes set up in front of you in a conveniently packaged multi-FX pedal! Boss’s primary selling point is in its amp modeling effects. Therefore, they don’t “promote” using the pedal as I do. They want people to simply use the “2 cable method” where you plug your guitar into the input of the pedal, then you plug the output of the pedal into the front of the amp. If you do that, then you are using 100 processed tone as opposed to using your amp’s natural tone. It sounds PHENOMENAL! I’m old af now and still at it!Can the gt6 also be configured like yours where pushing both fx pedals can get me into manual mode.AYNADAKIKEMALIZM.COM/resimler/files/compaq-storageworks-enclosure-4354r-manual.pdf Plus my amp has a parallel fx loop so it bleeds the dry signal which is fine for some effects but wah and pedal bend needs to be the full signal. So i figure these effects need to be pre amp whereas things like chorus and reverb can be post amp. Does the 4 wire method solve this issue? I love the 4cm! May be you can help? If you wanted to use external pedals in addition to the GT-100, you’d probably just put them before the input of the GT pedal. Then just connect the 4CM from there. Glen Delaune sells labels for the GT-100 on his site to help do exactly what you suggest. My only concern is that the individual stompboxes are not always the same in the patches and if I want to use manual mode and also use patches sometimes, it might be confusing if I label one footswitch Chorus but it is assigned to some other effect in some patches. Thanks, Scott So I can’t really comment on what you are talking about here. I was using the preamp from my amp, and the modeled preamp within the GT-100 unit was always shut off. Thanks for the comment though! I only use the GT-100 for effects like delay, chorus, reverb, etc. The only functionality that I need is to be able to control either MUTE or REC ARM (I think either would work fine) on 2 different tracks. To test this, I have a track with midi as the input, record armed. I have the BOSS midi out connected to my interface midi in (focusrite scarlett 18i20). I put reacontrolmidi in the fx. I enabled both the program change and control change boxes in reacontrolmidi. It's giving me no indication that any midi is being received in reacontrolmidi, in the midi activity log. Is this a valid way to test my setup. Can Program Change messages be used to trigger actions in reaper. Has anyone successfully used one of these BOSS GT series pedals with reaper. Thanks in advance for any ideas. I'm kind of stuck right now.I've got a GT3 also and thought I might use the expression pedal as a midi controller, so I'm curious, but haven't had time to sit down and learn how to put it all together.That's pretty much the type of thing I'll have to go through. Problem is reaper doesn't appear to be receiving any midi messages from the boss pedal. I'm using reacontrolmidi to test if it's working. I'm wondering if I need to adjust anything in preferences or what. Since it's just going to the midi in on my interface i would think the midi messages would simply come through.I mean, I'm sure I could come up with some uses for the expression pedal, which would be cool, but not my priority.Opened reaper again and now when I record a midi track it is recording those messages. Not sure why.i didn't change anything. But that's cool! Now, I tried to bind an action to a footswitch press, which is a pc message, and it is not registering that I've pressed anything. Can actions be bound to pc messages. Thanks for your help!!Awesome! Thanks! The same goes for the 991 GT3. With this in mind, Autos by Sympatico published a really fun interview with Andreas Preuninger, head of Porsche’s GT series production and chief engineer of the new GT3. If you hit the rev limiter, you hit the rev limiter.” When you’re done, check out our Master Landing Page for more about the Porsche 911 GT3. It is obvious that something is wrong internally(management) with Line6. The GT-10 looks like it is going to blow the X3L out of the water. Once people have the choice will be interesting to see what happens. Message was edited by: soymilksam I expect more of the same like a GT8 with a bit more, but we'll see. I'm pretty happy with my X3L. Damm glad I traded in my GT8 for it. To each his own.Please fill me in.Actually, just judging by the pictures, the GT-10 looks like it continues in the Boss tradition of badly laid out pedalboards. Why would they put the bank up and down pedals at the top of the pedal like that. It seems like that would be really awkward to get to those. But we have to remember; IT sounds good to us, to our own ears, and we might be a tad-bit biased about liking that solo we just pulled off. Do what feels right and hopefully someone might just dig your tone and your chops TOO. But i am not convinced it will blow the X3L out of the water. I still reckon that L6 make the best sounding modellers for the money and unless the COSM has been upgraded then they still do. I am just frustrated with the construction of the X3L which is why i have held off getting one. I am sure the software issues will be ironed out eventually.Boss gear tends to look good on paper, but in the real world...not so much so. I have owned a GT-8 and now own the x3. The amp sims is whats going to make or break any of these pedals. This has historically been Boss's biggest drawback in that their amp sims are sub-par. Yes, the effects are good but if you want an all in one package like myself, then Boss gear (up to the GT-8) is a waste moeny. I'll try the GT-10, but given Boss's record in the amp sim area, I don' t expect the Rosestta Stone of amp simulators from them. Moreover, It usually requires way too much time digging through their manual just to get the device to function. With the X3, although more complicated, its still world's better than the Boss. I still have a trusty old JV-30 keyboard and I recently bought the Roland Sonic Cell that I use for backing tracks (great tone module that has 2 slots in it for the Roland SRX cards).But, for me, the amp modelling is where it comes crashing down. I have been able to do some direct comparison of tones between the POD gear and Roland's COSM because the Sonic Cell is also a multi-effects module and has COSM modelling built in. The Sonic Cell is a very recent product that was only released late last year so the COSM in it would be fairly up-to-date.As I said, some people have got the COSM amp modelling to deliver the tone they like, but for me the POD is miles ahead in tone that actually sounds like a the guitar amp being modelled. To me, it's as if the Roland amp modelling is put through a 1980s process that morphs sounds into what typified music during that decade. Anyone doing 80s covers would probably be able to get the tone they want from COSM.For amp and classic effects simulation however, Line 6 sounds much better to me.The Gt-10 might be an enormous leap forward (like the tonal improvements from the Gt-6 to the Gt-8).It soinded and felt right (not as digital as its predecessors).Besides the X3 effects are much closer to Boss than the Boss sims are to the X3. Then you have the features, PLEASE.more inputs and outputs on the X3, vocal pramps, bass amps, variax support. The only thing that even allows the GT-10 to be mentioned on this message board is the fact that the software support and bugs aren't worked out yet. Seriously, not being a fanboy here, just put the features side by side then compare the amp sim quality. In fact take out the amp sim quality comparison since that is subjective. It's not apples to apples. The GT-10 is a subset of the X3.end of story. Message was edited by: jasonbogen Once people hear it and compare it and know what it is like it would be a good date to start discussions like that.I'm not rooting. As you pointed out, it’s just early (actually, too noisy lol) to judge the GT-10. To date, that is Boss’s weakest link in the chain of MFX device brands. And I mean it really needs to be a drastic improvement, not just a step up from current GT-8 COSM modeling. More user-friendliness would be good as well, the GT-8 definitely had a strong learning curve, especially for those not familiar with it's predecessors. If they can pull all of this off, and somehow manage to put the GT-10 out virtually bug free, they may stand a chance, but it's doubtful.They had Rob Marcello of Danger Danger demo the unit. What a shredder that guy is. Nice guy too. My friends agreed.It also lacks a microphone input (no on-board vocal processor?). It seems though I am one of those lucky people who got an X3 unit that has no issues whatsoever as of yet. I am one happy camper. Thank you Line 6.Message was edited by: stratplayer96 Like the Satriani photo - he's great. My friends agreed. It also lacks a. Thank you Line 6.And why the limitation on how many effects can run at the same time. No modeler has it all, and the X3L (even when 100 functional) is Line6's latest proof of that axiom.By then the main issues with the XL3 may have been sorted. The loop on the GT-10 is cool though. If those sounds on that video are the best it's got, I wasn't too impressed. I wonder if they were checking our forums before making that video?? If it is anything like the VG-99, it has two GT-PRO sound engines. I suspect there have been some programming upgrades for the 10 just as there was for the 99. By all professional reviews (i.e. Guitarist Magazine, et al) of the VG-99, the 99 has great tone, it would seem logical the 10, as little bro', has improvements as well.I tend to like both those drinks for different reasons. I think it is great there is good competition, it will make all the products better. Message was edited by: kaffeen A touch of reverb, a little bit of delay, and a sparing amount of chorus. I don't like my sound to be saturated. The bottom line is my ears could tell the difference in the quality of tones between the two units. The X3 came out on top not only because of the tone, but because it has XLR outs. That is a big deal to me. I have a GT-6, GNX3, Korg AXsomething, and V-amps 1 and 2. I have found the POD sound to be more warm to MY ears and more realistic when compared to actual amps and what not. For effects the POD is very good and the GT series effect are good too for BOSS stuff.My only choice is will I get both or just one. I'm 90 sure will be getting the X3 just for the pre-amps. Microphone interconnections are therefore a perfect application for a balanced interconnection, which cancels out most of this induced outside noise.Many other components, such as graphic equalizers and effects units, have balanced inputs and outputs to allow this. In recording and for short cable runs in general, a compromise is necessary between the noise reduction given by balanced lines and the cost introduced by the extra circuitry they require.This means that much of the electromagnetic interference will induce an equal noise voltage in each wire. Since the amplifier at the far end measures the difference in voltage between the two signal lines, noise that is identical on both wires is rejected. The noise received in the second, inverted line is applied against the first, upright signal, and cancels it out when the two signals are subtracted.A balun may also be used instead of an active differential amplifier device.Twisting makes the loop area between the conductors as small as possible, and ensures that a magnetic field that passes equally through adjacent loops will induce equal but opposite currents, which cancel out.Any noise currents induced into a balanced audio shield will not therefore be directly modulated onto the signal, whereas in a two-conductor system they will be.Due to common misconceptions about differential signalling, this is often referred to as a quasi-balanced or impedance-balanced output, though it is, in fact, fully balanced and will reject common-mode interference.The electromagnetic field around a differential line is ideally zero, which reduces crosstalk into adjacent cables. Noise that is correlated between the two amps (from poor power supply rejection, for instance), would be cancelled out. At higher frequencies, the output impedance of the output amplifier can change, resulting in a small imbalance.