3m ms drg definitions manual
LINK 1 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF
LINK 2 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF
File Name:3m ms drg definitions manual.pdf
Size: 2622 KB
Type: PDF, ePub, eBook
Category: Book
Uploaded: 20 May 2019, 23:36 PM
Rating: 4.6/5 from 616 votes.
Status: AVAILABLE
Last checked: 9 Minutes ago!
In order to read or download 3m ms drg definitions manual ebook, you need to create a FREE account.
eBook includes PDF, ePub and Kindle version
✔ Register a free 1 month Trial Account.
✔ Download as many books as you like (Personal use)
✔ Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied.
✔ Join Over 80000 Happy Readers
3m ms drg definitions manualIf you already license 3M APR DRG software you can access the ICD-9 and ICD-10 definition manual for free on the 3M HIS Support website. If you license 3M APR DRG through a 3M business partner, you will need to pay the licensing fee shown below. If you have questions about your relationship with a 3M business partner, contact 3M before submitting the order form provided below. The EAPG Definitions Manual includes both ICD-9 and ICD-10 content. This arrangement went into effect on July 1, 2004. NTIS also offers documentation and installation information. Therefore, under the IPPS, we pay for inpatient hospital services on a rate per discharge basis that varies according to the DRG to which a beneficiary's stay is assigned. The formula used to calculate payment for a specific case multiplies an individual hospital's payment rate per case by the weight of the DRG to which the case is assigned. Each DRG weight represents the average resources required to care for cases in that particular DRG, relative to the average resources used to treat cases in all DRGs. Accordingly, section 1886(d)(4)(C) of the Act requires that the Secretary adjust the DRG classifications and relative weights at least annually. These adjustments are made to reflect changes in treatment patterns, technology, and any other factors that may change the relative use of hospital resources. In a small number of MS-DRGs, classification is also based on the age, sex, and discharge status of the patient. Effective October 1, 2015, the diagnosis and procedure information is reported by the hospital using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS). This test software reflects the proposed GROUPER logic for FY 2021. For additional information regarding the Version 38 Test GROUPER please see the file titled CMS-1735-P Table 6P.1a below.http://www.aleph-zero.info/userfiles/file/3ug4513-1br20-manual.xml
- Tags:
- 3m ms drg definitions manual, 3m ms drg definitions manual downloads, 3m ms drg definitions manual pdf, 3m ms drg definitions manual download, 3m ms drg definitions manual 2017.
Zip file contains a PDF and text file that is 508 compliant --- Zip file contains a PDF and text file that is 508 compliant Zip file contains a PDF and text file that is 508 compliant. Zip file contains a PDF and text file that is 508 compliant. Zip file contains a PDF and text file that is 508 compliant. Under the HCPCS version of the MS-DRGs developed for this requirement, to the extent feasible, the MS-DRG assignment for a given service furnished to an outpatient (billed using a HCPCS code) is as similar as possible to the MS-DRG assignment for that service if furnished to an inpatient (billed using an ICD-10-PCS code). I’m going to use this and my next few turns in this space to talk about some of them, especially some which we didn’t have time in the presentation to reveal. Today, however, we’ll look at something unique to the grouper: its architecture. A “grouper” is a piece of software which takes as input a patient’s diagnoses and procedures as coded by medical record coders for an inpatient stay, along with the patient’s sex, age, discharge status and sometimes other data like birth weight for babies.Back then, most computers were room-sized “mainframes” with (literally) one-millionth the processing power of your cell phone.A procedure could be O.R. or non-O.R. MS-DRGs have 472 such attributes. APR-DRG has nearly 4,000. However, we can take advantage of the fact that there are only about 1,600 different patterns of attributes spread across 140,000 codes, and that some decisions are more efficiently based on code “clusters” than on individual codes. While this approach was super space-efficient on the old mainframes, it sacrificed speed, readability and the option of embedding other useful information (like how best to represent the logic in the DRG Definitions Manual). In the new ICD-10 MS-DRG grouper, the logic is expressed as a set of IF-THEN rules based on the attributes.http://xn--d1achljw0b.xn--p1ai/content/upload/3vz-fe-manual-transmission.xml CMS and its contractors enter the grouper specifications as they always have, but now (insert Twilight Zone theme music here) a computer program writes a computer program to do the decision making. A PC version is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service. I wouldn’t be surprised to see one on your cell phone before long. It has been a tough year so far, for so many reasons. The system aligns the care provided in the hospital with how it’s paid and helps organizations better understand their populations’ health across the care continuum. 3M AR-DRG Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (AR-DRGs) is an Australian admitted patient classification system which provides a clinically meaningful way of relating the number and type of patients treated in a hospital (known as hospital casemix) to the resources required by the hospital. Each AR-DRG represents a class of patients with similar clinical conditions requiring similar hospital services. See site above CC Complications or Comorbidities HCPCS-MS-DRG The 21 st Century Cures Act requires that by January 1, 2018, the Secretary develop an informational “HCPCS version” of at least 10 surgical MS-DRGs. Under the HCPCS version of the MS-DRGs developed for this requirement, to the extent feasible, the MS-DRG assignment for a given service furnished to an outpatient (billed using a HCPCS code) is as similar as possible to the MS-DRG assignment for that service if furnished to an inpatient (billed using an ICD-10-PCS code). Medicare Website LTC-DRG long-term care diagnosis-related groups The LTC-DRGs are the same DRGs used under the hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS), but they have been weighted to reflect the resources required to treat the type of medically complex patients characteristic of LTCHs. Relative weights for the LTC-DRGs reflect resource utilization for each diagnosis and account for the variation in cost per discharge.http://www.drupalitalia.org/node/67312 Under the LTCH PPS, the LTC-DRG relative weights are updated annually for each Federal fiscal year (October 1st through September 30th) using the most recently available LTCH claims data. Beginning in FY 2008, we adopted the refined severity-adjusted DRGs that were also adopted under the IPPS, that is, the Medicare-Severity-LTC-DRGs (MS-LTC-DRGs), which continue to be weighted to account for the difference in resource use by LTCH patients. Medicare Website MCC Major Complications or Comorbidities MCE Medicare Code Editor MDC Major Diagnostic Category MS-DRG Medicare Severity — Diagnosis Related Group Background: (from Medicare website) Section 1886(d) of the Social Security Act specifies that the Secretary shall establish a classification system (referred to as DRGs) for inpatient discharges and adjust payments under the IPPS based on appropriate weighting factors assigned to each DRG. Each DRG weight represents the average resources required to care for cases in that particular DRG, relative to the average resources used to treat cases in all DRGs. Congress recognized that it would be necessary to recalculate the DRG relative weights periodically to account for changes in resource consumption. Accordingly, section 1886(d)(4)(C) of the Act requires that the Secretary adjust the DRG classifications and relative weights at least annually. These adjustments are made to reflect changes in treatment patterns, technology, and any other factors that may change the relative use of hospital resources. Currently, cases are classified into Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs) for payment under the IPPS based on the following information reported by the hospital: the principal diagnosis, up to 25 additional diagnoses, and up to 25 procedures performed during the stay. To group diagnoses into the proper DRG, CMS needs to capture a Present on Admission (POA) Indicator for all claims involving inpatient admissions to general acute care hospitals.http://apartmangyula.com/images/3m-mp8755-projector-manual.pdf Effective October 1, 2015, the diagnosis and procedure information is reported by the hospital using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS). Evaluate Confluence today. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. ( Learn how and when to remove these template messages ) Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. ( March 2014 ) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.A central theme in the advocacy of DRGs was that this reimbursement system would, by constraining the hospitals, oblige their administrators to alter the behavior of the physicians and surgeons comprising their medical staffs.This legislation required that the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH) evaluate the applicability of Medicare DRGs to a non-Medicare population. This evaluation concluded that the Medicare DRGs were not adequate for a non-Medicare population. Based on this evaluation, the NYS DOH entered into an agreement with 3M to research and develop all necessary DRG modifications. The modifications resulted in the initial APDRG, which differed from the Medicare DRG in that it provided support for transplants, high-risk obstetric care, nutritional disorders, and pediatrics along with support for other populations.Inexorably rising medical inflation and deep economic deterioration forced policymakers in the late 1970s to pursue radical reform of Medicare to keep the program from insolvency. Congress and the Reagan administration eventually turned to the one alternative reimbursement system that analysts and academics had studied more than any other and had even tested with apparent success in New Jersey: prospective payment with diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). Rather than simply reimbursing hospitals whatever costs they charged to treat Medicare patients, the new model paid hospitals a predetermined, set rate based on the patient's diagnosis. The most significant change in health policy since Medicare and Medicaid's passage in 1965 went virtually unnoticed by the general public. Nevertheless, the change was nothing short of revolutionary. For the first time, the federal government gained the upper hand in its financial relationship with the hospital industry.In the past, newly created DRG classifications would be added to the end of the list.Cambridge University Press.Retrieved 2006-04-22. National Academies Press (US). 2011-06-01. CS1 maint: others ( link ) Retrieved 30 August 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-04-04. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. A recent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) analysis indicates the overall effect of the transition to ICD-10 on hospital reimbursement will be negligible. However, the effect on any individual hospital may vary due to that facility’s case mix or coding accuracy. 1 In order to assess the impact on their facility, coding managers need to be familiar with how the ICD-9 and ICD-10 classification systems differ and how these differences are addressed in the MS-DRG grouper logic for ICD-10. Some modifications have been made to the grouper logic, however, to account for inherent differences between the ICD-9 and ICD-10 coding systems while still ensuring that the same DRG is assigned. The grouper logic is detailed in the Definitions Manual for Version 32 of the MS-DRG Grouper, which is available online via the CMS website. 3 A combination code is a single code which represents multiple clinical issues. Clinical concepts that required two or more codes in ICD-9 only require a single combination code to be assigned in ICD-10. For example, atherosclerotic heart disease with unstable angina is reported with two codes in ICD-9 (one code for the atherosclerosis and one code for the unstable angina). In ICD-10, this clinical concept is reported with a single code: I25.110, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unstable angina pectoris. The DRG grouper issue is that in ICD-9, cases with atherosclerosis as the principal diagnosis and unstable angina, which is a CC, as a secondary diagnosis result in the case being assigned to a higher paying “with CC” DRG, when applicable. With a single combination code being reported in ICD-10, however, there is no separate secondary diagnosis code to cause the case to group to a “with CC” option. Appendix J of the MS-DRG Definition Manual includes a list of these diagnoses. Examples of principal diagnoses that can serve as MCCs for themselves include: This code is not a CC. Another example is seen with coding malignant hypertension and unspecified hypertension. In ICD-9, code 401.9, which is a non-CC, is assigned for unspecified hypertension and code 401.0, which is a CC, is assigned for malignant hypertension. In ICD-10, the same code, I10, is assigned for both unspecified hypertension and malignant hypertension. For example, the ICD-10 hypertension code I10 is not designated as a CC, like the ICD-9-CM hypertension code 401.9. This decision was made because code 401.9 was reported more commonly than code 401.0 in the CMS dataset used for analysis. For the purposes of DRG logic, typically, the more specific ICD-10 code is treated in the same way as its less specific ICD-9 counterpart for grouping purposes. For example, in ICD-10-CM, there are three code choices for atrial flutter: All of the new codes for these more specific types of asthma which do not include exacerbation or status asthmaticus in the code titles are not designated as CCs because the ICD-9-CM code 493.90, Asthma, unspecified, is a non-CC for the purposes of DRG grouping. However, the greater specificity provided by ICD-10 codes is one of the most salient features of the new code set. In the future, it is anticipated that the DRG grouper logic will be refined after CMS has analyzed claims data including the more specific ICD-10 codes. For example, some procedures that were reported with a single code in ICD-9 require two codes in ICD-10. To handle this reporting difference, grouper logic for ICD-10 includes a number of procedure codes that result in a different DRG when reported alone versus when reported along with another procedure code. However, when code 0JH608Z is reported along with code 0JPT0PZ, Removal of Cardiac Rhythm Related Device from Trunk Subcutaneous Tissue and Fascia, Open Approach, to indicate a generator replacement (codes assigned for the removal of old device and the insertion of a new device), a DRG for Cardiac Defibrillator Implant (DRGs 222 through 227) is assigned, resulting in a higher payment to the facility. Coding staff need to be aware of differences in guidelines to recognize that some DRG shifts noted when moving from ICD-9 to ICD-10 may in fact be deliberate. For example, the guideline for selection of the principal diagnosis in cases of admissions for anemia due to an underlying malignancy is different in ICD-9 and ICD-10. In ICD-9, the anemia is assigned as the principal diagnosis. In ICD-10, the code for the malignancy is assigned as the principal diagnosis. This guideline difference will result in a legitimate change in DRG when the case is coded in ICD-9 versus ICD-10. Depending upon the DRGs that are more commonly coded by a given hospital, the overall impact of the shift to ICD-10 on reimbursement will vary. Additionally, the CMS analysis of claims data did not involve recoding records.The extent to which a hospital’s coding staff assigns codes appropriately may also result in differences in DRGs and reimbursement. These differences need to be validated to determine if the change in DRG is correct or the result of a coding error. For example, injury codes in ICD-10 require a seventh character that identifies the nature of the encounter (i.e., initial, subsequent, or sequela). The assignment of the same injury code with a different seventh character (i.e., initial vs. subsequent) can result in differences in MS-DRG assignment, which has a significant impact on reimbursement. These cases may be coded incorrectly due to differences in ICD-9 and ICD-10. In ICD-9, this procedure requires a single code. In ICD-10, two codes are required: one for the repair of the intestine and another for the repair of the abdominal wall. If both codes are not reported, an incorrect DRG is assigned. For example, many state Medicaid programs use the 3M APR-DRG Grouper to determine hospital reimbursement. Similar analyses on the impact of ICD-10 implementation on reimbursement related to these different payers and groupers must also be conducted. However, through the analysis of coding and DRG data prior to implementation, hospitals can implement measures to minimize the impact on both the coding staff and the facility’s bottom line. AHIMA Has Resources that Can Help You through the Transition. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience. Each of the original CMS-DRGs hadIn contrast,A comorbidity is a conditionOver 14,000 ICD-10-CMThe relativeA higher relative weightThe condition,It often takes several days to identify the actual cause ofFactors such as severity, risks, complexityPneumonia must be assignedThis is why accurate, precise,Because of coding rulesPursuant to coding rules,CMS requires all “significant” procedures toA significant procedure is one that is surgical in nature,However, some OR proceduresSome common proceduresA medical DRG is one where no OR procedure isAs an example,CCs and MCCs are secondary diagnoses that may impact theIn most cases, a CC increases the relative weight and an MCC results in an evenFor example, DRG 293 (heartBy definition, in “chronic”The only ICD-10-CM codes available for myocardialA heated debate arose among my group lastShould I admit that patientAnd what about a similar situation where IThank you! It simply provides that an admissionThis content is adapted with permission fromThe views expressed in this column are those of the author andAll published material, which is covered by copyright, represents the views of the contributor and does not reflect the opinion of the American College of Physicians or any other institution unless clearly stated. Subscribe to CDI Strategies. ICD-10 is expected to map similarly to ICD-9; meaning when coders correctly report the same record in both ICD-9 and ICD-10, MS-DRG assignment should be the same, says Richard Averill, MS, senior vice president of clinical and economic research at 3M Health Information Systems in Wallingford, CT. 3M, is under CMS contract to convert MS-DRGs from ICD-9 to ICD-10. And that depends on the level of detail included in the medical record, says James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, managing director of FTI Healthcare in Atlanta and a member of the ACDIS advisory board. The assumption that ICD-10 changes will only have limited impact on MS-DRG assignment is based on the assumption that hospitals have a strong CDI program and that coders are currently assigning accurate ICD-9 codes, Kennedy explains. A question and answer session will follow the presentations. The agenda includes: Registration closes at Tuesday, May 17, at 1 p.m. The next ICD-10 national provider teleconference will be held on Wednesday, August 3. Subscribe to CDI Strategies ! All rights reserved. I hope I didn't make it too long, but I wanted to show my steps. Can someone explain to me why a total system pacemaker inserted into a patient with a principal diagnosis of pneumonia does not impact as a surgery procedure DRG. Is there a coding rule that I have missed. We have coded pneumonia, unspecified organism as PDx in the 3M encoder. I coded 0JH606Z for pacer, right atrium lead 02H63JZ, and right ventricle lead 02HK3JZ.The DRG comes out to be DRG 194This does not seem correct. MS-DRGs associated with ALL MDCs and under the Surgical MS-DRGS (981-989). It shows that Insertion of pacemaker is in the list for surgeries that impactManual under the Appendix F Unrelated OR Procedures (MS-DRGs 981-989) and I didPDx List- DRGs 987- 989. Can someone please explain where I have gone wrong. Thank you, Leigh I attached the pathway. Hope this helps. We have 360 encompass encoder also. I attached the pathway. Hope this helps. To experience the easy yet powerful Coding platform, talk to us. No Hardware. Simply Web ezEncoder Features CodeBook Click Here to Know More Learn more about our other AI-based mid-revenue cycle management solutions. Computer-Assisted CDI Software Computer Assisted Quality Measures Computer-Assisted Coding Compliance Contact Us. The APR DRG Definitions Manual contains proprietary information (MS-DRG.DRG Grouper (ICD) User Manual Version 18.0 (MS-DRG) Grouper requirements as If data entered is insufficient for the DRG Grouper to function. An updated version of the MS-DRG Definitions Manual files can be found here.Ms-drg definitions manual. 5 stars based on 164 reviews siliconsports.net Essay. Business development template ppt name five things that do not be cited or documented.Inpatient Hospital APR-DRG Reimbursement Values. AHCCCS covered procedures can be viewed in the AHCCCS Medical Policy Manual (AMPM) APR-DRG Code Values.zComplete definitions manual containing all clinical logic is provided to all users zUser review and comment is encouraged Microsoft PowerPoint - 3M APR DRG.ppt. MS-DRG versus APR-DRG Goals.Ms-drg Essay. Pros and cons of mcdonaldization working at height certificate template vlsi testing. Compare Search ( Please select at least 2 keywords ) Most Searched Keywords. The roxy tribeca 1 Livescribe smartpen paper.CMS MS-DRG Table 2017.What is DRG? Meaning of DRG medical term. Ron Mills writes at 3M Health Information Systems that CMS is working on a PC version of the groupers for early next year. He has covered the transition of medical coding systems for four years.He has more than a decade of experience in online journalism. Previously, he was the online business editor for Newsday.com, covering the metro-New York area. He also was a senior regional editor for AOL's Patch.com, a network of local news sites. Henry has also spent many years as a professor for the Center for News Literacy. He also writes the Innovation Pulse column in Healthcare IT News. Prior to HIMSS Media, Tom was News Editor of IDG's InfoWorld. He is a Neal finalist and multiple ASBPE award-winner whose work has appeared on CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post and Computerworld. Current issues with ICD-9 in documentation will pers. Current issues with ICD-9 in documentation will persist with ICD-10. Taking an advanced approach to CDI now that accounts for all lengths of stay, all payers, and all care settings can make all the difference. This infographic shows you advanced CDI at a glance. The number of code pairs will increase under ICD-10. The good news is that ICD-10 policies and edits can be included in your medical necessity content. This infographic provides an overview of the medical necessity issues you should be aware of as you transition to ICD-10. This guide includes insights from 3M experts and clients on empowering your ICD-10 program, analyzing financial impact, and measuring success, plus videos, media links, checklists, and links to useful industry sites. Abstract Objective On October 1, 2013, the reporting of diagnoses and procedures in the U.S. will transition from the clinical modification of the ninth revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) to the tenth revision (ICD-10). We estimate the impact of conversion to ICD-10 on Medicare MS-DRG payments to hospitals using 2009 Medicare data. Methods Using the ICD-9-CM MS-DRG v27 (FY 2010), the converted ICD-10 MS-DRG v27, and the ICD-10 to ICD-9-CM Reimbursement Map for fiscal year 2010, we estimate the impact on aggregate payments to hospitals and the distribution of payments across hospitals. However, the use of mappings between ICD-10 and ICD-9-CM will produce less consistent results, especially if the mapping is not tailored to the specific application. Key words: ICD-10, Mapping, Payment Impact, MS-DRGs, Medicare Since 1979, the U.S. has used the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to report diagnosis data across all sites of service and procedure data for inpatient care. On October 1, 2013, ICD-9-CM will be replaced by the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) to report diagnosis data across all sites of service, and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) to report inpatient procedure data. In the FY 2009 update of ICD-9-CM, there were 14,025 diagnosis codes and 3,824 procedure codes. In the FY 2010 update of ICD-10-CM, there were 69,101 diagnosis codes and in ICD-10-PCS there were 71,957 procedure codes. Since diagnosis and procedure based patient classification systems, such as the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs), are used in payment methodologies, payers must adapt their payment systems to ICD-10. Under a mapping approach, as providers submit claims with ICD-10 codes, the payer would map each code to an equivalent ICD-9-CM code (or codes) so existing ICD-9-CM based payment applications could continue to be used by the payer. In many areas, ICD-10 classifies clinical conditions and procedures differently from ICD-9-CM. As a result, the conversion of complex payment methodologies, or the use of maps from ICD-10 to ICD-9-CM, could have an unintended impact on aggregate payments to providers or the distribution of payments across providers. Medicare uses the Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs) as the basis of payment in the Medicare inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS). The availability of both versions of MS-DRGs can provide the basis for quantifying the impact on aggregate payments to hospitals, and the distribution of payments across hospitals, arising from the conversion of MS-DRGs to ICD-10. In addition, CMS has posted an ICD-10 to ICD-9-CM Reimbursement Map on its Web site ( CMS, 2010b ). The Reimbursement Map selects a single ICD-9-CM coding alternative that represents the most reasonable match for each ICD-10 code for the purpose of MS-DRG assignment. The availability of the reimbursement map can provide the basis for quantifying the impact on aggregate payments to hospitals, and the distribution of payments across hospitals, resulting from the use of the ICD-9-CM version of the MS-DRGs with mapped ICD-10 data. This paper uses the ICD-9-CM MS-DRG v27 (FY 2010), the converted ICD-10 MS-DRG v27, and the ICD-10 to ICD-9-CM Reimbursement Map for fiscal year 2010, to estimate the impact on aggregate payments to hospitals and the distribution of payments across hospitals. Payments based on the MS-DRGs assigned using ICD-9-CM coded data with the ICD-9-CM version of the MS-DRGs are compared to: Payments based on the MS-DRGs assigned using ICD-10 coded data with the ICD- 10 version of the MS-DRGs. Payments based on the MS-DRGs assigned using ICD-10 coded data converted back to ICD-9-CM, using the Reimbursement Map with the ICD-9-CM version of the MS-DRGs. Methods Creating an ICD-10 Database Since there is no large scale database available that contains diagnosis and procedure data coded in ICD-10, it was necessary to create a simulated ICD-10 database by using the General Equivalence Mappings (GEMs). The GEMs are a comprehensive, translation dictionary between ICD-9-CM and ICD-10. Taking the complete meaning of a code as a single unit, the GEMs identify the most appropriate translation(s) to the other code set. There is an ICD-9-CM to ICD-10 GEM and an ICD-10 to ICD-9-CM GEM for both diagnoses and procedures. CMS has posted the GEMs on its Web site ( CMS, 2010c ). The database used to create the simulated ICD-10 data was the FY 2009 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) data. There were 10,984,798 inpatient claims coded in ICD-9-CM in the FY 2009 MedPAR database. For each MedPAR record in the 2009 database, a plausible ICD-10 record was created using the GEMs. Given the information available in the ICD-9-CM codes on the record, the objective of the translation was to create a correctly coded ICD-10 version of the same record. Due to the increased specificity of ICD-10, a single ICD-9-CM code often translates to multiple ICD-10 codes in the GEMs. The translation process required selecting a single ICD-10 code from among the alternative possible translations in the GEMs.